Re: [sfc] IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity
Dan Wing <danwing@gmail.com> Tue, 16 March 2021 14:38 UTC
Return-Path: <danwing@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1884B3A1028
for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 07:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 71nMp4CRL1OU for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 16 Mar 2021 07:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 877E73A102B
for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 07:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id n9so21770610pgi.7
for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 07:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=JZlgCTV8RmLUAV/2hYJ9EAZWsz6SBAP2je6xTpEkgbI=;
b=LoE2gEOYiNpo1pW+0ENIwGDAIJ+XeZBghygWsfIM2rLpvNnJyXH3URr51obRowSN2m
ZYR8Yc6QsKpgeUh+zgn4LEcEtZLvAL95Ut4/u9uue+F2UO8fN7bpbDwNQoDLZDPwvba9
H/IMD5a5FsUqBwkCC+DZ8Xa2Ib/rCAxdLoHzpGZsuoc2HpQ+/0WxmqHSpcHervCxxgh/
1i+ruHSi+wIxxKLWdfHLvmCy4e6kuOB6QvIbQfyNUqzl+6wZAdfEW0aK4nDjUagntRWL
MNdwjgF/eCbz1t+GCl3bZmB1tht5pUxR47ywMuvrP2pVnpSZqqv8Nx6+m9OQ0b+Tep0T
x/8g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=JZlgCTV8RmLUAV/2hYJ9EAZWsz6SBAP2je6xTpEkgbI=;
b=p7Dny/FgctBY8ma/In+QaDRVI9t8HoujCcUJq1YKuebTBb5Ux2Hmok75tBjfu3HW+z
USiHj/QoZc2qCaSlGwh1+2bevpJKDCMlz7qf13hNv6fVawdLPlwsLqZAgTlipcpnhQI1
dEI0EE2ngslzS+ltat6nc1idd5J8p5jDhHkV8Xx+gqdudVI80IpCj/vByyiAcQZe+O4X
Le734JYDyO6yxeJ2cq8olFr1yv6d3VWUeNWfRSnPGdAwcU7fVWbyhujqwF6gPzUolq6F
oorDLLYt0P6t2MD0xNgRDWipo8nYS5Z7eAEpJ2Zsut89JZrkv6wR29t3J54Azgw3iYFj
veZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53165BuLJpWjEWpDABnsnDzPrPnOi8udC+vxUUPH+lxquqsTIJPl
UQC2EQm9UVVSkoSNBIrrFLM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwaF1HAGCPE79sUMIEcTzW37mOf/oIpkhqLJnitV+QFicCNHVWTso5+aEAuhCYa21zcAlT85Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:5bc4:0:b029:1fe:86f7:3a66 with SMTP id
p187-20020a625bc40000b02901fe86f73a66mr26317480pfb.42.1615905485427;
Tue, 16 Mar 2021 07:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.60]
(47-208-190-34.trckcmtc01.res.dyn.suddenlink.net. [47.208.190.34])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s194sm17302459pfs.57.2021.03.16.07.38.04
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 16 Mar 2021 07:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Dan Wing <danwing@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9155_1615788407_604EF977_9155_339_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353534D6@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 07:38:03 -0700
Cc: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>, "Konda,
Tirumaleswar Reddy (TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com)"
<TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com>,
"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1D9D1294-448F-4608-AA4E-919443A7EE22@gmail.com>
References: <161365771236.8570.11348497959366101106@ietfa.amsl.com>
<2b68064f-4dd0-d7db-ae78-2971bc572e93@joelhalpern.com>
<CA+RyBmV--OA8C0KAZdQdtONndO2_C3HMKXeVKOEYo=nXoYD5HQ@mail.gmail.com>
<9155_1615788407_604EF977_9155_339_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353534D6@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/AKWrz76VWSXnEayEtOIY3qzrfHo>
Subject: Re: [sfc] IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>,
<mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>,
<mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:38:08 -0000
I am not aware of IPR related to draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity. -d > On Mar 14, 2021, at 11:06 PM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > As an input to the write-up, I confirm that I have no IPR nor I’m aware of any. > > I let Dan and Tiru answer to the IPR check. > > Cheers, > Med > > De : sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Greg Mirsky > Envoyé : jeudi 18 février 2021 16:05 > À : Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> > Cc : sfc@ietf.org > Objet : Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity > > Hi Joel and Jim, > I'll be happy to shepherd this document. > > Regards, > Greg > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6:25 AM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > The WG Last Call for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity has completed > successfully as noted below. > > We now need a document shepherd. > It would be good for someone other than the chairs to do this. > If you are willing, please let us know. We will pick someone with a few > days. > > Thank you, > Joel > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity > Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:15:12 -0800 (PST) > Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org > Resent-To: tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com, james.n.guichard@futurewei.com, > jmh@joelhalpern.com > Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:15:12 -0800 > From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> > To: draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity@ietf.org, sfc-chairs@ietf.org > > > The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity has been changed to "WG > Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up" from "In WG Last Call" by Joel Halpern: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity/ > > Comment: > Thank you. This document has completed WG Last Call successfully. > Thanks to the authors for promptly addressing comments raised during > that last call. We will now pick a document shepherd, and in parallel > ask for an updated security review. > > _______________________________________________ > sfc mailing list > sfc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. >
- [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-s… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… wei.yuehua
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… mohamed.boucadair
- [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-s… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sf… Dan Wing
- Re: [sfc] IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sf… Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
- Re: [sfc] IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sf… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sf… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sf… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sf… mohamed.boucadair