[sfc] Use of Alternate Marking Method in SFC
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 14 June 2017 14:53 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD5F127B52 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eNWgZCzFmWvM for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A71D127B31 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id e11so1926377oia.2 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xM+GWuy07fbHgZ5FEwzWEpyZkPuksSOga9ztrVInXUY=; b=FpaKydIseIxaNrhbnfVI6WKjQsIZAt3atkI3Je4tf3mMC8HKZ+3D0S7rIhyXVQ/ZDf 7quaURmFqi5K7QOMOZ5DpPdDckOps+i16uWPWIJKLWVxEv+pMPvOt9stXset5KC1Wr47 Qr9n2Zd2LCH3mDmxpDfoVmbh7pCVW3+X4lPyfQnx1YuU3YQr9yqd6JunDxbEuOTHSzrH DW8bOkK04p3LScW9iRdWS8Lk5I0R61dCHE1MG6Q2dnZF56Qq2mYQYvKMELgH89OmtZ+v MAmq1bB5xBSEt+W10C7YHMzS8HAAwVeV+euso22OVm6l7ZZgw5KzE1kzrmQWKE3AgsUY L+Pw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xM+GWuy07fbHgZ5FEwzWEpyZkPuksSOga9ztrVInXUY=; b=pPCU2jk2dVNaLp8CNzRg7gMKd3MU556HQwH35R8UQd5DQzcIHKnNAqVV0POzdv2lkR g6BmG4dhp7Bqc3mnW0NZ+Vo4FNxrd7oK1P/C5xXNObSVuBKbUjU+NVq6WEEfBqktS7bf fALKmvrEVgr/B9QOjsb4o8vrAXjMWdxzMRNaoEdzcF8Wij/ZZfr35BXvDX40p1zCaWox SKFYPbiQZek5bEuIJ/hA1wR+v4aScndcBzYkzOgVVgcevSjpsusLjAQIzNMj928HtRe5 gMDfZZhbzHFUon73gnnu6poGRLvnzGJp8kGiv+tKq4Q/6k+7sKbCBU2OQc4xHMipMHv2 MOJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOx66JHEjQzzuE38bv4mDLVF0XH6PScUXx86oaIrzkbqXBL8K70Q ZIrBOrkVoe9LsG+ZR5IS10zyAVHNl8iy
X-Received: by 10.202.87.87 with SMTP id l84mr392602oib.214.1497452028558; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.52.225 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:53:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVMN34DC49E01eCcLkSRjvCe4e43s6-rb7fZg4-AELJQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: sfc@ietf.org
Cc: "Fioccola Giuseppe (giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it)" <giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d2ecc3b22970551ecb891"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/DSmk6AfOhj5qL13WvCh3_3GqW6g>
Subject: [sfc] Use of Alternate Marking Method in SFC
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:53:51 -0000
Dear All, would like to bring your attention to the draft Performance Measurement (PM) with Alternate Marking Method in Service <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-00>Function Chaining (SFC) Domain <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-00> we've submitted earlier. Alternate Marking method allows performance measurement performed close to passive measurement methods. Greatly appreciate your questions, comments, and suggestions. Regards, Greg
- [sfc] Use of Alternate Marking Method in SFC Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Use of Alternate Marking Method in SFC Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [sfc] Use of Alternate Marking Method in SFC Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Use of Alternate Marking Method in SFC Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] Use of Alternate Marking Method in SFC Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Use of Alternate Marking Method in SFC Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [sfc] Use of Alternate Marking Method in SFC Dave Dolson
- Re: [sfc] Use of Alternate Marking Method in SFC Stewart Bryant