IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header-03.txt

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Thu, 08 August 2019 08:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6546B120105; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 01:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G6A7_xy7Tk2f; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 01:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5EE1120024; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 01:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar06.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.8]) by opfedar20.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4641Dc6W13z8t3G; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:06:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.29]) by opfedar06.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4641Dc5b7tz3wb4; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:06:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e878:bd0:c89e:5b42]) by OPEXCAUBM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::d42b:2e80:86c2:5905%18]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:06:56 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header@ietf.org>, "Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy (TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com)" <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQHVTb2XNMydnzLynkaU4/FaDqBeN6bw4xug
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:06:56 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330312FF871@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <156525045684.7674.8732997960914125164@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156525045684.7674.8732997960914125164@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.245]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/D_QQdaiFOKsrA3TGqjpFy_SS3v8>
Subject: Re: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header-03.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:07:00 -0000

Hi all, 

The only point we had in our to-do-list for this I-D is about integrity protection, but as per the discussion in Prague#104 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/slides-104-sfc-sfc-chair-slides-01) no change was added to the draft. Having a generic mechanism seems more appropriate.

I'm currently discussing with Tiru about a first sketch of such generic mechanism. We hope to have something to share by September/October.  

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de
> internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Envoyé : jeudi 8 août 2019 09:48
> À : i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc : sfc@ietf.org
> Objet : I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header-03.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Service Function Chaining WG of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : Service Function Chaining: Subscriber and
> Performance Policy Identification Variable-Length Network Service Header
> (NSH) Context Headers
>         Authors         : Behcet Sarikaya
>                           Dirk von Hugo
>                           Mohamed Boucadair
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header-03.txt
> 	Pages           : 9
> 	Date            : 2019-08-08
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document defines Subscriber and Performance Policy Identifiers
>    Network Service Header Variable-Length Context Headers to inform
>    Service Functions about subscriber- and service-related information
>    for the sake of policy enforcement and appropriate service function
>    chaining operations.  The structure of each context header is
>    defined, their use and processing instructions by SFC-aware nodes are
>    explained.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header-03
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header-03
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header-03
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email