[sfc] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-10.txt

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Mon, 29 June 2020 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431933A0C5C; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CKalHASMqNwT; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ACCA3A0C47; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id 9so19880482ljc.8; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=1oQ9TiA3+0Ss2lyWyu+4/NYyp6D/poWzGfvGbNMtuhc=; b=CCf5mDl/fnujZAeS72tqb6Kczf6EWjEh2n2M2uadrs5f+Ia8zgXLKPFeJV50FjMeFh A5LlpPg06LvjOCd2voWmR1TUpPodMcqPP7WUD7hv5VVZc7vVcNQeu5ZiIqXDTnu32jUw O2gmxP//FjY7SHh3T47ATEUohcujWVuM9QPsBlH8L5bl5cjdrDHla/oasURgQVTBpW+z d+kcLNovui2A9j5BZntOeKv/jXULULHUsNy2OJdn5TquKXpgzTbIS4KFskmRULJzti5E 8nDCtjTxoTVTLnqZVyxrVsPW10Kl1avIRbMraIVD6xpGWqkWJlkoc4ninPeoATYc7NUZ p6UQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=1oQ9TiA3+0Ss2lyWyu+4/NYyp6D/poWzGfvGbNMtuhc=; b=rqIg9/5jA20rCiVTlaZQnPvA2/Zv7B10wk68a7/DCObTrmAitfQ3IGLlNk4XRXJrkd IxsFMuFQOeAW7UDGxbbTsZfc33C+4VOelomMXQUPKShvSoqMeoNQwG1NtCCtpNy7xyIS 3weztEd9Fxryuts2EAv83yAL9bVzYYLpQQVWbl6UvER2UG7fL8SH6sDgaZDkDqBczil5 tF3pjiivVDMqYvO19Q1LqLlCUjXNE1lFqhXG/3kx3SbaPP4PqyaFIYxTXz17DrwOBkz1 GrB/LGKOKswLCx0hY6BXDVhUGN0hSmHYNIhDogbRTuFHlpcOi7X2xop/AUtatLZN9rlS RrWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531LzAxiNkK27TvR66IK/jZHKZ+4cOZgzqP31Fb6Tgb5SVptUZwM ixGbe3ReOAepyP1auDa0TS7Pff86k45fkz3kaVMjyA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyoylCLl06GKw8bOoyQ7cbpFyu01ahpPHVql+W4M23SUTYgyb9KKNcdXK3bvGErJIZcV4ww+SEr79nqgzewszw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:54e:: with SMTP id q14mr8006349ljp.279.1593464428029; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159346400433.13706.15340299360573188142@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159346400433.13706.15340299360573188142@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:00:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmW06mi4Hf9CET=8pBJt9-st4fYhjfWaj4tULfiVfYHUZg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Service Function Chaining IETF list <sfc@ietf.org>, sfc-chairs@ietf.org, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000031ea4205a93f5985"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/DfiG7LjSsxqjEhekYyByWZvg6sI>
Subject: [sfc] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-10.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:00:32 -0000

Dear All,
the updated version of the draft intends to address comments by Carlos
received during WG AP. Changes in this version are as follows:

   - changed track to Experimental
   - extended Introduction section with references to SFC OAM Framework and
   iOAM in SFC NSH documents
   - removed Double Marking section. We propose to allocate a one-bit flag
   and thus only Single Marking or Multiplexed Marking methods can be used in
   SFC NSH domain.
   - extended the Security Considerations section with the note that the
   number of concurrent flows monitored using AMM must be controlled on an SFC
   node.

Your questions, comments, and suggestions are welcome and greatly
appreciated.

Regards,
Greg

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 1:53 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-10.txt
To: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>, Greg Mirsky <
gregimirsky@gmail.com>, Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>



A new version of I-D, draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-10.txt
has been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm
Revision:       10
Title:          Performance Measurement (PM) with Alternate Marking Method
in Service Function Chaining (SFC) Domain
Document date:  2020-06-29
Group:          sfc
Pages:          8
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-10.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-10
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-10

Abstract:
   This document describes how the alternate marking method can be used
   as the efficient performance measurement method taking advantage of
   the actual data flows in a Service Function Chaining (SFC) domain.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat