Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam
Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com> Fri, 26 November 2021 02:10 UTC
Return-Path: <huzhibo@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3BF3A033F
for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 18:10:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id gIyhZiIdTCRe for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 18:10:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com
[185.176.79.56])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A59533A02D0
for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 18:10:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201])
by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4J0dVG6qn0z67D4b;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:09:42 +0800 (CST)
Received: from canpemm500010.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.118) by
fraeml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id
15.1.2308.20; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 03:10:16 +0100
Received: from canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.203) by
canpemm500010.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id
15.1.2308.20; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:10:15 +0800
Received: from canpemm500009.china.huawei.com ([7.192.105.203]) by
canpemm500009.china.huawei.com ([7.192.105.203]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.020;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:10:15 +0800
From: Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com>
To: Joel Halpern Direct <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>, "sfc@ietf.org"
<sfc@ietf.org>
CC: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, Greg Mirsky
<gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam
Thread-Index: AQHXz1F3oBapEAHe1k6BOj8KZxnE66wVNbLw
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 02:10:15 +0000
Message-ID: <c224bee798da4a6eb321d598c7a0f64b@huawei.com>
References: <4bb5abb4-a8dc-c8f0-9b99-549f683e7729@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <4bb5abb4-a8dc-c8f0-9b99-549f683e7729@joelhalpern.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.232.179]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/DsEGqBilm-zqNo-OEIJr8Ktok6U>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>,
<mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>,
<mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 02:10:26 -0000
Hi WG: Support . Troubleshooting SFC is a complex tax for operators and having additional OAM capabilities that can provide value to operators in E2E SFC troubleshooting is a major gain for operators. Best regards Zhibo -----Original Message----- From: sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joel Halpern Direct Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2021 2:51 AM To: sfc@ietf.org Cc: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>om>; Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Subject: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam I have received a polite request with explanation for delay asking for more time to read and review the subject document. Given the state of the working group, i want to encourage any and all review. So I am extending the last call by two additional weeks. Please read and review the document. Also, if you are willing to serve as shepherd for this, please let the chairs know. (Don't worry if you have not shepherded a document before. The chairs are more than happy to help you with the process.) Thank you, Joel _______________________________________________ sfc mailing list sfc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
- [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-mult… Joel Halpern Direct
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… wei.yuehua
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Gyan Mishra
- [sfc] SFC OAM gap analysis [Was Re: Regarding las… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] SFC OAM gap analysis [Was Re: Regarding… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Huzhibo
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Joel Halpern Direct
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Joel Halpern Direct
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-… mohamed.boucadair