Re: [sfc] IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity

["Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy" <[e-mail]>]

I confirm that I am not aware of any IPR related to draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity.

-TIru

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Wing <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 8:08 PM
> To: Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
> <[e-mail]>; Joel M. Halpern
> <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [sfc] IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity
> 
> CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> I am not aware of IPR related to draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity.
> 
> -d
> 
> 
> > On Mar 14, 2021, at 11:06 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
> >
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > As an input to the write-up, I confirm that I have no IPR nor I’m aware of
> any.
> >
> > I let Dan and Tiru answer to the IPR check.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Med
> >
> > De : sfc [mailto:[e-mail]] De la part de Greg Mirsky
> > Envoyé : jeudi 18 février 2021 16:05 À : Joel M. Halpern
> > <[e-mail]> Cc : [e-mail] Objet : Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG
> > state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity
> >
> > Hi Joel and Jim,
> > I'll be happy to shepherd this document.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Greg
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6:25 AM Joel M. Halpern <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> > The WG Last Call for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity has completed
> > successfully as noted below.
> >
> > We now need a document shepherd.
> > It would be good for someone other than the chairs to do this.
> > If you are willing, please let us know.  We will pick someone with a
> > few days.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Joel
> >
> >
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity
> > Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:15:12 -0800 (PST)
> > Resent-From: [e-mail]
> > Resent-To: [e-mail], [e-mail],
> > [e-mail]
> > Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:15:12 -0800
> > From: IETF Secretariat <[e-mail]>
> > To: [e-mail], [e-mail]
> >
> >
> > The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity has been changed to
> > "WG
> > Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up" from "In WG Last Call" by Joel Halpern:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity/
> >
> > Comment:
> > Thank you.  This document has completed WG Last Call successfully.
> > Thanks to the authors for promptly addressing comments raised during
> > that last call. We will now pick a document shepherd, and in parallel
> > ask for an updated security review.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sfc mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
> >
> __________________________________________________________
> ____________
> > ___________________________________________________
> >
> > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses,
> > exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message
> > par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les
> pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
> >
> > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
> > privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be
> distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
> this message and its attachments.
> > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> > Thank you.
> >