[sfc] FW: I-D Action: draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-sr-01.txt
James N Guichard <james.n.guichard@huawei.com> Fri, 06 April 2018 16:01 UTC
Return-Path: <james.n.guichard@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9EB1204DA; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eiqmbhJoKRHO; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03A05120724; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id F419F1DB5A938; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 17:00:56 +0100 (IST)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 17:00:58 +0100
Received: from SJCEML521-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.168]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.179]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:00:56 -0700
From: James N Guichard <james.n.guichard@huawei.com>
To: 'SPRING WG List' <spring@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-sr-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHTzb2nByW4bpDMJkWMGDkBHS04aqPz4zTA
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 16:00:55 +0000
Message-ID: <BF1BE6D99B52F84AB9B48B7CF6F17DA3134F226C@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <152302920760.3826.7185513920159046150@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <152302920760.3826.7185513920159046150@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.157.109]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/J0CF-EGlNQthTdXLkaQ8S703Pfg>
Subject: [sfc] FW: I-D Action: draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-sr-01.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 16:01:08 -0000
Dear WGs: This document is relevant for both the SFC and SPRING WGs; the authors very much welcome comments/suggestions from the community. Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Friday, April 06, 2018 11:40 AM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-sr-01.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : NSH and Segment Routing Integration for Service Function Chaining (SFC) Authors : James N Guichard Haoyu Song Jeff Tantsura Joel Halpern Wim Henderickx Mohamed Boucadair Filename : draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-sr-01.txt Pages : 15 Date : 2018-04-06 Abstract: This document describes two application scenarios where Network Service Header (NSH) and Segment Routing (SR) techniques can be deployed together to support Service Function Chaining (SFC) in an efficient manner while maintaining separation of the service and transport planes as originally intended by the SFC architecture. In the first scenario, an NSH-based SFC is created using SR as the transport between SFFs. SR in this case is just one of many encapsulations that could be used to maintain the transport- independent nature of NSH-based service chains. In the second scenario, SR is used to represent each service hop of the NSH-based SFC as a segment within the segment-list. SR and NSH in this case are integrated. In both scenarios SR is responsible for steering packets between SFFs of a given SFP while NSH is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the service plane, the SFC instance context, and any associated metadata. These application scenarios demonstrate that NSH and SR can work jointly and complement each other leaving the network operator with the flexibility to use whichever transport technology makes sense in specific areas of their network infrastructure, and still maintain an end-to-end service plane using NSH. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-sr/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-sr-01 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-sr-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-sr-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
- [sfc] FW: I-D Action: draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-sr-0… James N Guichard