Re: [sfc] Philosophical question about MD types 1 and 2

Hi Adrian, 

The agreement was that you can (not a should, though):

"the documents defining MD-1 formats can also define a MD-2 Type code for carrying the same block of information with the same structure."

Please note that a standard track document is needed for MD#2, while defining MD#1 context can be in an informational RFC.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Adrian Farrel
> Envoyé : mercredi 17 février 2021 23:40
> À : sfc@ietf.org
> Cc : rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
> Objet : [sfc] Philosophical question about MD types 1 and 2
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry if this re-opens old wounds...
> 
> If I define something to go in a fixed length MD type 1 context
> header, should I also define how it is carried in an MD type 2
> header?
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.