Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Thu, 04 February 2021 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E854C3A1456 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 05:19:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.118
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OGX63UtdVxEe for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 05:19:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 298483A1453 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 05:19:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfednr02.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.66]) by opfednr21.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4DWfJy3R8Rz5vry; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:19:14 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1612444754; bh=hb3TBEWkoSTWb+Ty8qR9p8iaEVf8kTIhmfu1mtJaaz8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=wyOzr01aJnGdx1JvKL7GT6uFAx4M7wYtaXiMrvcG2eYWCg6FGS5ExrHAaUAe1JYf9 MyB9iO9yvdi6Msslb1/tt0rMYvTqki52kXZSJkcmyKVIi+ka+9/mgKkjvBKZQSyqK5 ocCanUHrPnGpr9JbAlMLu5lfOnZWoqymuomg1nehm/5Hd+Qb/JV1RdC4phxiPNUrzG Ll4kxa6QUX7t1nKTGh0jeYz4+Idl/FsChqvk3UaYouiHdNi2OYYVVhk/xSws3dBlPu LL8LOaHBHwjzPjj6h5bSyBNQwE+MwaARb7/2+ERBDl6b0LYlmYF/Ws1aCbpnpOvbfQ mDPfA7g62dzeA==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.67]) by opfednr02.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4DWfJy2Tmrz8sYL; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:19:14 +0100 (CET)
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de" <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>, "jmh@joelhalpern.com" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity
Thread-Index: AQHW9YrpfLSXynP7SSCWRxa8bcUgZqpG8ZEQgACgO3CAAG8roA==
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:19:13 +0000
Message-ID: <17586_1612444754_601BF452_17586_69_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330315C6EB2@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <161184769798.6893.13499187160157088449@ietfa.amsl.com> <48b9f1db-38cb-7703-3c1e-7d2e75f93d19@joelhalpern.com> <BEXP281MB016502C249FFAA56E4BA1C93D1B49@BEXP281MB0165.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <1381_1612420026_601B93BA_1381_76_7_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330315C6B70@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <1381_1612420026_601B93BA_1381_76_7_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330315C6B70@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.247]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/LmCNoiHajjWe-EIwLw47cYRPq_4>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:19:18 -0000

Dirk, 

A version that integrates almost all your inputs is now available at: https://tinyurl.com/nsh-integrity-latest. Please check.   

For this one: 

==
Base Header: Provides information about the service header/ Base and Service Headers 
> Is it rather Service Path Header(s) what is meant here - or what is difference between Service Header and NSH??
==

we are actually echoing Section 2.1 of 8300. That text is correct as it is basically referring to the role of "MD type" and "next protocol". The service header covers both the "service path header" and context headers.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de
> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> Envoyé : jeudi 4 février 2021 07:27
> À : Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de; jmh@joelhalpern.com; sfc@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-
> integrity
> 
> Hi Dirk,
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> FWIW, your comments are recorded at
> https://github.com/boucadair/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity/issues/4.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Dirk.von-
> > Hugo@telekom.de Envoyé : mercredi 3 février 2021 21:53 À :
> > jmh@joelhalpern.com; sfc@ietf.org Objet : Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG
> state
> > changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh- integrity
> >
> > Dear all,
> > I agree that the doc should move forward.
> > I have sent a list of nits detected and questions for minor
> > clarifications to the authors in parallel.
> > Thanks for the good work!
> >  Best Regards
> > Dirk
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sfc <sfc-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2021 16:33
> > To: sfc@ietf.org
> > Subject: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-
> > integrity
> >
> > As you can see below, the SFC Chairs have started the WG last Call
> for
> > the nsh-integrity draft.  Please respond.
> > Thank you,
> > Joel
> >
> >
> > -------- Forwarded Message -------
> >
> >
> > The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity has been changed
> to
> > "In WG Last Call" from "WG Document" by Joel Halpern:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity/
> >
> > Comment:
> > This starts the SFC Working Group last call for the NSH integrity
> > protection document.  This will run through the end of the day
> > February 11, 2021.
> > (Don't worry about time zone.  If it is still Feb 11 2021 somewhere
> in
> > the world, you can send in comments.)  Please respond.  Silence is
> not
> > consent, and when (if, but we hope when) we send this to the AD, we
> > need to be able to describe meaningful WG support for the
> publication.
> > And if possible, more than just +1.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Joel (and Jim)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sfc mailing list
> > sfc@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sfc mailing list
> > sfc@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> ____________________________________________________
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses,
> exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message
> par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi
> que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles
> d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete
> altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
> privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not
> be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender
> and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
> been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.