[sfc] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-14.txt
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Fri, 24 September 2021 11:19 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059E73A249C; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 04:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aGuVTSrbrkLt; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 04:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D9F93A2497; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 04:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id c21so34328347edj.0; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 04:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2BdOT2zg0ow/JyAOHqxLh+bvfSf911uSLlIGhFbVH4o=; b=fysTfdAdXE3xvQKy+umSrmCPjJQ8Rm9/YiJq/3APlsHKikopwkKG78ha5ZMJn5oG9A A79p7hanSDiuelru6HNd9lLm5C8xRR5Jp9Pi7CIV9Ihm+TzKULuZo2gKVniXP/ZJFuB/ pPkjfDQR20MJu28bG/oVi0rNb7JQ/3EEDURr1EYq8yYssjdyULaRvC2df3lpg+Eod+jv Gty6NDCQ0EAvVfwrhDsGS3mP0VojFQp6IouAn35RP7OjDlCgnTGs9ebOaKsAge5wWxoq NGFles3eNd4GRA6FaDFdkPOsZBSaYxuJBjl7zNPmuyxB2i2FATtWTZKkBfl5F1q/7dwz RgVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=2BdOT2zg0ow/JyAOHqxLh+bvfSf911uSLlIGhFbVH4o=; b=g6KYFhnZnMyIUXcyF+4RTsEhjBbOW7qjailQClyvRv/WVHZgBXyJ3gcSlqSOJHwMFz /SIkJoQfpWFgHT5iAh5DuDGfpNYx3niHnczLgf4m0+iK9R+Hk9clcIGCqVxt++MFhRwo eotlsdQU6hBPYC8508srynyuImZm+L/hw1XYz69HbjQA06XBduwEDtQ8BR/G5YEheOFz 0GPtQvUKOa5O9r9chqaTO166T8Ql8lKUhEtf0KUWK2I9Xxp1zZLz1jDpl0SjAUTzY6+T 6VOlPXZa9PkzVhdAcYHO2FzXOXwNd8EbREmWOPD95IbK5wSHPGW/t/TAe5K1e36NuN0w bxfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dfuvlMAMkxFxZ9i+T+Q+aFm+Xhf1k0w+hhUKUSMHyjrN19UxQ KlRpwyHPvD3wSLwIYomFiSu7qn/FGHKHgC4NKQNn2JILugM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSFapybleZeSkVB7/HU8xhxi1onKirrIktgEugA5RssKEx0wEX4q0K7yx0VhValfHrGfC/xQJ525+6qOY5XAE=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:369a:: with SMTP id a26mr10513068ejc.539.1632482366587; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 04:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <163248175846.22954.653184529341066756@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <163248175846.22954.653184529341066756@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 04:19:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVRONAypVZC7wsA_0ieBJ0V-qvf-TeoibfwUg4T7HD6mw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Service Function Chaining IETF list <sfc@ietf.org>, sfc-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009008ba05ccbbeb9a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/Ns2xc1sntuupKz3_hgIMNcS3efE>
Subject: [sfc] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-14.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:19:34 -0000
Dear All, though this is a technical refresh, it presents an opportunity to inform the SFC WG that the RFC 8321 that defined the Alternate Marking method, along with RFC 8889, are in the process of being elevated to the Standard track RFCs based on the solid support from the IPPM WG and the deployment experience. I will keep the group updated on that process and hope that the SFC WG keeps that in mind when considering the adaption of this draft. Regards, Greg ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> Date: Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:09 AM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-14.txt To: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>, Greg Mirsky < gregimirsky@gmail.com>, Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com> A new version of I-D, draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-14.txt has been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm Revision: 14 Title: Performance Measurement (PM) with Alternate Marking Method in Service Function Chaining (SFC) Domain Document date: 2021-09-24 Group: sfc Pages: 8 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-14.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm/ Html: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-14.html Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-14 Abstract: This document describes how the alternate marking method can be used as the efficient performance measurement method taking advantage of the actual data flows in a Service Function Chaining (SFC) domain. The IETF Secretariat