Re: [sfc] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-26: (with COMMENT)

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Hi Paul,
thank you for your suggestion. I've updated the figure accordingly. Please
find the diff attached. If highlights this update as well as others that
result from Eric Vyncke's DISCUSS and COMMENTS.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 2:43 PM Paul Wouters via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-26: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> NIT:
>
>   0                   1                   2                   3
>   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>  |    Source ID  |   Reserved1   |           Length              |
>  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>  |          Port Number          |           Reserved2           |
>  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>  |                         IP Address                            |
>  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
> The last box for IP Address should use ~ instead of | as it can be either
> 4 octets of 16 octets.
>
>
>
>