Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Fri, 13 December 2019 09:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41FB120115 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 01:02:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Z3OR74DbekT for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 01:02:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 034F112008C for <sfc@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 01:02:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfedar03.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.5]) by opfedar20.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 47Z4SS4rqZz8sfK; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 10:02:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.38]) by opfedar03.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 47Z4SS3dnDzCqkm; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 10:02:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e878:bd0:c89e:5b42]) by OPEXCAUBM5C.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::393d:418c:3f1d:991d%21]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 10:02:48 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
CC: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header
Thread-Index: AQHVsS7YfiddW8aW4kKfS5vW0vYpVKe3xVpg
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 09:02:47 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330313EA726@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <157599887144.9975.7887971558651782704.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <71423503-e1a3-31f1-43fc-527a0004ec2a@joelhalpern.com> <CAF4+nEGfnOowdh_7+RyQLR3viewFx3t6Rr870QTffONLGWJBTw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEGfnOowdh_7+RyQLR3viewFx3t6Rr870QTffONLGWJBTw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.247]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330313EA726OPEXCAUBMA2corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/QPfG4qTe3JIgPu-enGCqKpPDH8M>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 09:02:52 -0000

Hi Donald,

Point taken (https://github.com/boucadair/draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid/issues/1). Thank you.

Cheers,
Med

De : sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Donald Eastlake
Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2019 21:58
À : Joel M. Halpern
Cc : sfc@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header

I support this draft. It provides useful features.

Minor point: for completeness, the descriptions of header fields in Sections 3 and 4 should include all fields.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com<mailto:d3e3e3@gmail.com>


On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 8:52 AM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com<mailto:jmh@joelhalpern.com>> wrote:
Starting WG Last call.  See comment below for description.
Thank you,
Joel


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header
Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:27:51 -0800 (PST)
Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent-To: james.n.guichard@futurewei.com<mailto:james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, jmh@joelhalpern.com<mailto:jmh@joelhalpern.com>,
tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com<mailto:tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:27:51 -0800
From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>>
To: draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header@ietf.org>, sfc-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:sfc-chairs@ietf.org>


The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header has been changed to "In
WG Last Call" from "WG Document" by Joel Halpern:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-serviceid-header/

Comment:
This starts the working group last call for this document.  It has been
discussed on the email list.  We need to see responses.  If you see issues
with publishing this document as an RFC, please speak up now.  And please be
clear about what your concerns are.   At the same time, if you think that
publishing this as an RFC is a good thing for the working group, please
speak
up.

As a note for those who may be concerned about the relationship to the TLV
draft, the chairs have noticed that problem, and we believe we have gotten
that document unstuck.

Given the propensity for people to disappear at this time of year, I am
giving the document a 4 week last call.

Thank you for your time and attention,
Joel (& Jim)

_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc