IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

"Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" <venggovi@cisco.com> Mon, 14 May 2018 07:22 UTC

Return-Path: <venggovi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4644B12D7F2; Mon, 14 May 2018 00:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2EbbqXKlLvTV; Mon, 14 May 2018 00:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B86212D7EC; Mon, 14 May 2018 00:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1688; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1526282559; x=1527492159; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=6R/vDo70o8cRceVPb2MfDAWHOKfjlH6tPrXGTVmLbfk=; b=mnmj8jk0sDUTs7azq/UT5hTI6qcCGWvNWeHDrTCbfLFmCV6UGExtUdqr ACUujimLyms7LnhKBiaVTz++wq/jYnU2pNDMLxf8vWKyluhzEtVtVhGr/ r5bdK+DhbjOoyYb2GKaItvI9tW38M8ecKrSeIZ9hH/C9GfG3SlXGZxNYd g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CjAwDZOPla/4kNJK1cGwEBAQEDAQEBCQEBAYNDYXsoCoNoiASMbIMIkzKBeAsjg0iBAQIagm8hNBgBAgEBAQEBAQJsHAyFKQYdBhFVAgEGAhoCHwcCAgIwFRACBAESCIMdgX8PjiubQYIciDyCIgWBCYccgVQ/gQ+DC4MRAgMBgTmDI4JUApg2CQKFZYhigT6DZYJfhHWJVYZnAhETAYEkARw4gVJwFTuCQ4JIiEiFPm+PS4EYAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,399,1520899200"; d="scan'208";a="177011284"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 May 2018 07:22:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (xch-rcd-019.cisco.com [173.37.102.29]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w4E7MceL032458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 14 May 2018 07:22:38 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-020.cisco.com (173.37.102.30) by XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (173.37.102.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 14 May 2018 02:22:37 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-020.cisco.com ([173.37.102.30]) by XCH-RCD-020.cisco.com ([173.37.102.30]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 14 May 2018 02:22:37 -0500
From: "Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" <venggovi@cisco.com>
To: "sfc-chairs@ietf.org" <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-brockners-sfc-ioam-nsh@ietf.org" <draft-brockners-sfc-ioam-nsh@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
Thread-Index: AQHT61OBo5x9VKZFCk2x3fjM3LuTYqQu0bRA
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 07:22:37 +0000
Message-ID: <724512258fdd4f25bf24d04b4d54c7cc@XCH-RCD-020.cisco.com>
References: <1526282186.3465.4.camel@akshay-ThinkPad-E460>
In-Reply-To: <1526282186.3465.4.camel@akshay-ThinkPad-E460>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.65.47.20]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/TO4QBoxxjA5BqZ9Mc0kh39L2ejQ>
Subject: Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 07:22:41 -0000

Hello Chairs,
As an implementer of IOAM drafts, I have read this draft and support the adoption call.
Thanks
Prasad

On 5/7/18, 5:57 PM, "IETF Secretariat" <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>; wrote:

 

    

    The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state

    Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Joel Halpern)

    

    The document is available at

    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-proof-of-transit/

    

    Comment:

    As discussed in London, and requested by the document authors, this is a two

    week call for adoption for this document. Reminder: the question is not

    whether this is done, but rather whether this is a good start on work the

    working group would like to advance.

    

    Please speak up.  Silence is NOT consent.

    Given the long list of authors, the chairs particularly need to hear from

    non-authors.

    

    Yours,

    Joel (& Jim)

    

    PS: The issue of there being too many authors will be dealt with separately. 

    That is not an obstacle to adoption, merely an annoyance to the chairs.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email