IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-09

Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu> Tue, 23 July 2019 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ghanwani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D4412040B for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.091, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zyj2xU8vnvOc for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-f48.google.com (mail-ua1-f48.google.com [209.85.222.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC189120405 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-f48.google.com with SMTP id v20so17093307uao.3 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lpGn1tlDrlw7+50ceUZ01xxFAvM0k8pLeOc4HCBx5eo=; b=ZLmYYPCXJj/UE/zqgUUWBJ7E2rVP2c0Qn/D7elVP4hR7fN9dTN7z4Vq6sCTiiTxkl7 JxntSNCTvmyOR1HR/A9V87wOraXTyKQj8XgkB6mgFednpDwulSqXSEwOPEhi/4GfT47/ 3va0GwGIJyYLcM3QEyct9HYhS9zFPxdRm5EhUfR6I+7w0FJm/+o5yz0HoXLAJpfGQR3c dJ1fcyo64XB5DiiNisSqS6K/D3noJN1i5mDHPJSgJfDATKTSuaLTQuGXXz5lrllzi1mu CgwFYyfwsv7Pp6OJPn/HVz3iCaURXac17UTGt+2becGOzXKZad1lnhzgIO7FeoHw1Yvc D/XA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVOoYTnKRkQDs7XvpgdTK/zPUmotc0rB2NrcRckMlZeUn2++wiQ 3djs4lHdKBxZqhecDBarrX2iXCfyadP6kVX5fiE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxT54PTiz/a+bCvlLgXI5WgeICUn0aGSjQhhjbGdr+Z44p6NsA19Q1Hf5HnqyJvYe+q5E1qttlaG/wJPD+IjbQ=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:a1:: with SMTP id 30mr48046120uaj.29.1563896578083; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CH2PR13MB36083279DAC4BF4D9746DAF4D2C70@CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CH2PR13MB36083279DAC4BF4D9746DAF4D2C70@CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
From: Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:42:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+-tSzwB-9aVyAWSrwX7w=LKdVLO8fQr12JSG=om55hQjqbSCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
Cc: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000092a0058e5b0c00"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/U-Lja7Dcbgaap46JkWxVSLKUkZE>
Subject: Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-09
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:43:10 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR.

Thanks,
Anoop

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 6:27 AM James Guichard <
james.n.guichard@futurewei.com> wrote:

> Dear WG:
>
>
>
> This email closes the WG LC for draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-09. The
> chairs have concluded that there is enough support to move this document
> forward for publication as an Informational RFC. Authors, please confirm
> that any IPR you are aware of has been declared.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Jim & Joel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* James Guichard
> *Sent:* Monday, July 08, 2019 9:15 AM
> *To:* sfc@ietf.org
> *Subject:* RE: WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06
>
>
>
> Dear WG:
>
>
>
> Before closing this WG Last Call, we (the chairs) would like to better
> understand the level of interest and commitment the WG has on progressing
> OAM work for SFC, starting with draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework as a baseline.
> Please reply to this email with either support for the document, or
> non-support (we do not need this document). Silence does not imply support
> or lack thereof so please take time to state your opinions with a brief
> rational for support/non-support.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Jim & Joel
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* James Guichard
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2019 10:30 AM
> *To:* sfc@ietf.org
> *Subject:* WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06
>
>
>
> Dear WG:
>
>
>
> This message starts a new two week WG Last Call on advancing
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework/
> <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Ce47e5eb13f224f18c46408d6e378b2f7%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C636946504868870205&sdata=lkKvAgmKik7lkqGANQpnIvBRdbjKAqYtzTUdTfB9f3Y%3D&reserved=0>
> for publication as an Informational RFC.
>
>
>
> Substantive comments and statements of support for publishing this
> document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can
> be sent to the authors.  This last call will end on 11th June 2019.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Jim & Joel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email