IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 04 November 2021 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775733A1157 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 10:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.546
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.546 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_COMMENT_SAVED_URL=1.391, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR=1.242, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KQN47EdlZ97Y for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 10:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 696173A1150 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 10:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id c8so7171972ede.13 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 10:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DgN09w+DC5UdxWxKc/oUnYYBHXWKv6csBdADI0QaNTk=; b=AyY2Pdeu6BY1lOM5QK46uLwUnV8JLWAqy2E7ph8ffKoqgdjC3JIWSXYMVjBQiZAX7Q MB1xIq1UPE+6aq8Cj6+DQa07mfUs/sErsnsWd2j/VGfNZtfiq51C8938i22dfbzkuu0B TMnRxhReODwPvf7g5+FS8VOuBmKzg5ooNeDUu9Mohm37H76dOJWd6g0tnjmJuw6IlrUY 0ci9b94ez5nz1zdcK8c9lclbor54AwkGEDZDA2R3rF8YSTU5Ptr10FHWWv4+0S5sxGD/ ph5SUP9cwyKW38ubQFGqxG31NpHD6dU4sXUae9PPsa+IJlB+tWpBgUBrqK62J+MVLoef X7sg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DgN09w+DC5UdxWxKc/oUnYYBHXWKv6csBdADI0QaNTk=; b=EHFcFClsVOsIFv86f0CvMJ1JRw03aLYEK1phdJSvf6dnkj3bGX4k/+NIUhs6hKYxEc DKvDIoYtdcFq2FjhhVMKiF+zNPdKyUBGxpJ+B5pWmssy4zLWOQV7Y1MHncrzgfaq8wh7 iG0LFL2WRR438CW4WDE+oY89EdY+zaoj0LYxiwGY5DiBT6CWc/3YmFfzVXLnrTRT8gNW OESAiPlLBwpfjK6W0ZMHJavS9QEwBjbub+gCwHzj+Bp9mPm//d0PQWU3zlptUl2ISY4c mXytg20hNBfx46LUVHafr4yJvw+DdmV5jE/zcnQzj5/9DsUAY4cVSdOW704UqK+YGciZ 7Bgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/XE9aKxVXoxwWhxMJ7J/bcCogGLSoky4jwx1LrWcHTUl8w5yn PD+mlQjtKflQHhcxW4Bt87W03/1JbHIb/U3t3Sg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYPCbDI5ZQUdwXbIzV14Rw0GgHNvQZEuRUOpjFRNEAnm8g65YTMbKL7InFpuuArD0IEracoKwI6itI8nBydDk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4388:: with SMTP id o8mr23258687edc.342.1636045873845; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 10:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4bb5abb4-a8dc-c8f0-9b99-549f683e7729@joelhalpern.com> <FR0P281MB05273398407D9F38D2DC84F8D18D9@FR0P281MB0527.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <FR0P281MB05273398407D9F38D2DC84F8D18D9@FR0P281MB0527.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 10:11:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUSe99YeNC=zg8cgxN-HmO6D=g_GfJ94dEbNy_D_zJVfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de
Cc: jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com, sfc@ietf.org, james.n.guichard@futurewei.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="00000000000025bf9a05cff99d89"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/UItNTazNGQG4Iu3yVPLkUd2MmtQ>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 17:11:30 -0000

Hi Dirk,
thank you so much for the review and your suggestions. All are very helpful
and are accepted with much appreciation. (I've noticed misalignment in
Figure 10 when I followed your comment).
I've added a figure in Section 6.4.1 illustrating the sub-TLV encoding of
the errored TLV.
Attached, please find the new working version and the diff highlighting the
changes (most are resulting from the added figure). I hope that the updates
address your comments.

Best regards,
Greg

On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:54 AM <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de> wrote:

> Dear all,
> I have quickly checked and reviewed the document and think it is well
> written and quite completely describes the requirements and exemplary OAM
> messages for SFC. My only comment would be for sect. 6.3.1.:
>
> Length is a two-octets-long field, and the value equals the length of the
> Value field in octets. => Length is a two-octets-long field, and the value
> equals the length of the data following the Length field counted in octets.
> [As in sect. 6.6.3 as there is no 'Value field' defined for Source TLV!]
>
> Also, I wonder whether in sect. 6.4.1. one should add a Figure describing
> the format of the 'sub-TLVs' - similar as to Fig. 10 for 'SF Information
> Sub-TLV' ?
>
> Thanks!
> Best regards
> Dir[k
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sfc <sfc-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joel Halpern Direct
> Sent: Montag, 1. November 2021 19:51
> To: sfc@ietf.org
> Cc: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>om>; Greg Mirsky <
> gregimirsky@gmail.com>
> Subject: [sfc] Regarding last call for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam
>
> I have received a polite request with explanation for delay asking for
> more time to read and review the subject document.  Given the state of the
> working group, i want to encourage any and all review.  So I am extending
> the last call by two additional weeks.
>
> Please read and review the document.
> Also, if you are willing to serve as shepherd for this, please let the
> chairs know.  (Don't worry if you have not shepherded a document before.
>   The chairs are more than happy to help you with the process.)
>
> Thank you,
> Joel
>
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email