IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

"Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> Tue, 08 May 2018 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <repenno@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABD612EA52; Tue, 8 May 2018 09:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DabkUYVT8siE; Tue, 8 May 2018 09:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 859A1126E64; Tue, 8 May 2018 09:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2410; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1525798663; x=1527008263; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=JBAGPFhywL/JK1voI+E/oiyatqHqSL2Fk67Snq5/AuY=; b=lvT26hd0qKJYRv9x8yhKYtUQOPqxQMmEfUtWpjg+OWG9eg3yDGTTqMQ1 EJxUQerOraF8KJH6EQvBK4kyhynfAWBwB78E4BLK4lGihWZI+Plv5TDn5 jlin+1Tw0cSlb+OOCUzdUmq8/BqcC97yeViDbaLWglWEojLrdMMQ47aAT s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DZCgDt1fFa/4QNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNDYXooCoNllHaBWCGBD5UgCxgLg0iBAQIagkshNxUBAgEBAQEBAQJsHAyFKAEBAQEDAQEbBhE6FwQCAQgRBAEBAwIfBwICAiULFQgIAgQBEoNNAYFWD6cxghyDeQGESYJDBYEJhxyBVD+BMgyCXIMRAQEDAYE5gyMwgiQCkQOHJwgChWOIaIE1g2CHTYlGhl8CERMBgSQBMiKBUnAVOyoBghiCSIhIhQgBNW+QO4EYAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,379,1520899200"; d="scan'208";a="111362183"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2018 16:57:42 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (xch-rcd-006.cisco.com [173.37.102.16]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w48Gvg1i016899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 8 May 2018 16:57:42 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-009.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 8 May 2018 11:57:40 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-009.cisco.com ([173.37.102.19]) by XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com ([173.37.102.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 8 May 2018 11:57:40 -0500
From: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>
To: "Roberta Maglione (robmgl)" <robmgl@cisco.com>, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>, "draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org" <draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org>, "sfc-chairs@ietf.org" <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
Thread-Index: AQHT5f7cya1YpWvhE06gBn7PuIxLPaQmYb+A//+MFQA=
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 16:57:40 +0000
Message-ID: <511E0FD0-8A9A-4926-A41E-B6D765A0B7D1@cisco.com>
References: <152569607848.1439.13053030504229319467.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <125c9198f5634a3ca37e1fb29893bc77@XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <125c9198f5634a3ca37e1fb29893bc77@XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.c.0.180410
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.157.20.23]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <40B22F862944FD429C893C68CF5ED2A6@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/UUGI45rs9cA176E0MMiQ4FVeFmM>
Subject: Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 16:57:46 -0000

I support the adoption.

On 5/8/18, 9:52 AM, "sfc on behalf of Roberta Maglione (robmgl)" <sfc-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of robmgl@cisco.com> wrote:

    I support the adoption of this draft as WG item.
    Roberta
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: sfc <sfc-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of IETF Secretariat
    Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 2:28 PM
    To: draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org; sfc-chairs@ietf.org; sfc@ietf.org
    Subject: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
    
    
    The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Joel Halpern)
    
    The document is available at
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-proof-of-transit/
    
    Comment:
    As discussed in London, and requested by the document authors, this is a two week call for adoption for this document. Reminder: the question is not whether this is done, but rather whether this is a good start on work the working group would like to advance.
    
    Please speak up.  Silence is NOT consent.
    Given the long list of authors, the chairs particularly need to hear from non-authors.
    
    Yours,
    Joel (& Jim)
    
    PS: The issue of there being too many authors will be dealt with separately. 
    That is not an obstacle to adoption, merely an annoyance to the chairs.
    
    _______________________________________________
    sfc mailing list
    sfc@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
    
    _______________________________________________
    sfc mailing list
    sfc@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email