Re: [sfc] IETF SFC - Liaison statement from ITU-T SG11: LS on recent service function chaining related developments in Q4/SG11: two new draft Supplements
"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Wed, 30 June 2021 13:00 UTC
Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960453A1BC7 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 06:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.338, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cu8Kn2Mo4CXq for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 06:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25AE73A1BC5 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 06:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GFM0H66CMz6GM8H; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 06:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1625058047; bh=28yrOYlIdKF/2zUkQi+tXpv3twogREbwSRFQEKH+QzQ=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=kBpFi9GT3HEEn/WEKqQIdVYUyyUakuToCQvzYoJUL0BZOya2dLkPd1w4YjuX0U0DW eGx0+wYK1xncOBFRBy2yYGSbs83Meo04/fjrLfHTBww0IOZlEKh5Bfb6faI9/sk1y5 d1Ocjtzv9HWB2NpIBMsW1pKz2lyY78uCX5/atAHg=
X-Quarantine-ID: <nuy19-DWboPf>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.23.64] (50-233-136-230-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GFM0H2Tg8z6GHf1; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 06:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
References: <GV0P278MB054400B2E91A1255F882553ABE759@GV0P278MB0544.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAF4+nEHtKCJLkw-jq0VBqJ0kpr-H1GCq8dXsE3J+Va55J1Pjxw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <e8769a5d-ea8f-2ac4-a265-57f149ab7e67@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:00:44 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEHtKCJLkw-jq0VBqJ0kpr-H1GCq8dXsE3J+Va55J1Pjxw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/Ur-z2r7tTX29rIyUGCCIfWHkqTI>
Subject: Re: [sfc] IETF SFC - Liaison statement from ITU-T SG11: LS on recent service function chaining related developments in Q4/SG11: two new draft Supplements
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:00:53 -0000
I am glad you found the liaison interesting. Is there any meaningful response you think we as SFC should send? Yours, Joel On 6/30/2021 1:28 AM, Donald Eastlake wrote: > I have reviewed this Liaison from the ITU and attachments. It speaks > of Service Function Chaining requirements being studied by the ITU > which seem interesting to me. I am working on a draft related to these > requirements. > > Thanks, > Donald > =============================== > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA > d3e3e3@gmail.com > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 11:34 AM TSB SG11 Secretariat, ITU > <tsbsg11=40itu.int@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >> Dear colleagues, >> >> At its meeting [Virtual, 17-26 March 2021], ITU-T SG11 agreed to the attached liaison statement to be sent to IETF SFC. >> >> [sp16-sg11-oLS-00179]: LS on recent service function chaining related developments in Q4/SG11: two new draft Supplements. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Carolina. >> ITU-T SG11 Secretariat. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sfc mailing list >> sfc@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc > > _______________________________________________ > sfc mailing list > sfc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc >
- [sfc] IETF SFC - Liaison statement from ITU-T SG1… TSB SG11 Secretariat, ITU
- Re: [sfc] IETF SFC - Liaison statement from ITU-T… TSB SG11 Secretariat, ITU
- Re: [sfc] IETF SFC - Liaison statement from ITU-T… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [sfc] IETF SFC - Liaison statement from ITU-T… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] IETF SFC - Liaison statement from ITU-T… John E Drake
- Re: [sfc] IETF SFC - Liaison statement from ITU-T… Donald Eastlake