IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] IETF SFC - Liaison statement from ITU-T SG11: LS on recent service function chaining related developments in Q4/SG11: two new draft Supplements

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Wed, 30 June 2021 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399113A1EDF for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 07:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PcZ7SYAuC3ts for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 07:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com (mail-il1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DC4B3A1EDC for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 07:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id i17so3051535ilj.11 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 07:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=w9k9gTHKl9dpjDGjynUKbWFdCGn9JgUfGHYWNzNPnTI=; b=uI0u3ogchP2yE5LC4PpNLCFmHTW3wfd2aRT7Gu4E+2i7ZXOGlUpcpzOhagNqR5v9BF Kgc2rLPUoQDV3xTBvvbXBQ9mpDhszb303NYyAQFpJWmCS3vrItX0rwcl1QaYJMpPox1z RFEdWX5oRLX0pWIoohl/pLqZa1Xv0semeyUvMgB0KTPLja0Xdh97rVhlBJThIAi1jpEw pSCZ66Cu9KD4n4RTAYWkqSk8R6XGh+cnSc8T/qtH4go13f+tS+CM1MBJDK+4kGc7gvSj 3cHl7q4pwhOGzOojGfyTkDgaydDDCdNJ7g/uoaoHurhJn9cHTMZvl+L7TrGr/Ucis5vm Z43w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=w9k9gTHKl9dpjDGjynUKbWFdCGn9JgUfGHYWNzNPnTI=; b=N4wRD30AkkYL/RU/Fyw9vHf4Or4Ba+/1fVNpz1cAcPUWbushRQn7Xrmy6P4ZSW68Wd pO3KKwjtZOJLSCHD15G8nYbjgr1Mx8n7huaw/4kd8H1YxMESGFU6pex+a0bdDvOy3Htr U+/NVG/57zZpKek7ItktlkGKlRIFwFM+C+K67Ntft+eAXsUZRfQeKupJQ70HOOpFn8zq BwAfPqZYbi9e2Rhw+Fi7713Jbt+WpAWs4iXhPLln/YOAngQ8L+a1u1SS3cQo4CEnSTt3 PgKpUQyTS55YNV0pbHOY+83h1ZPgEbTXafocHGbhR41XYRNVQsp67vfK2sqGApKCuLdg JLjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KjgVraY8apFgbEC5IU3RSrn3XyRZGGajYpnzAlI88G28aVryQ ie9KRs7MNfG7dT3QCmV51MWq2weq8MVQcn8ZHfXsN2dPgvg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyuU/VkXyTXFrfHNTGzWBJ3E7daAA44IU8h3qp5H3KheT6Lz/HRKTjRnIrmZW9X+Xx/lXlExupg+cWZDpGdX6Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:184a:: with SMTP id b10mr1273492ilv.40.1625064207860; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 07:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <GV0P278MB054400B2E91A1255F882553ABE759@GV0P278MB0544.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAF4+nEHtKCJLkw-jq0VBqJ0kpr-H1GCq8dXsE3J+Va55J1Pjxw@mail.gmail.com> <e8769a5d-ea8f-2ac4-a265-57f149ab7e67@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <e8769a5d-ea8f-2ac4-a265-57f149ab7e67@joelhalpern.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:43:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEFqht_So_Twn=yzGp9YnPxp0s0qe==0oKj4qCdD8KV4=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d8c76d05c5fcbe07"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/Vjd30r_2AOyuMZPl3tG0UafHh4A>
Subject: Re: [sfc] IETF SFC - Liaison statement from ITU-T SG11: LS on recent service function chaining related developments in Q4/SG11: two new draft Supplements
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:43:33 -0000

Hi Joel,

Just what a "meaningful" response is seems like a judgement call. But I
believe that relatively soon (on a time scale of weeks) we should send a
responding Liaison that

- thanks them for their liaison
- says that we welcome other parties, such as them, communicating their
views of Service Function Chaining and related requirements to the IETF
- thanks them for keeping the SFC WG informed of their progress on their
two SFC Signalling Requirements documents
- states that we will keep them informed of SFC WG progress on any related
requirements or facilities for meeting such requirements


If you would like, I'd be happy to draft such a liaison.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com


Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com


On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 9:00 AM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> I am glad you found the liaison interesting.  Is there any meaningful
> response you think we as SFC should send?
>
> Yours,
> Joel
>
> On 6/30/2021 1:28 AM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
> > I have reviewed this Liaison from the ITU and attachments. It speaks
> > of Service Function Chaining requirements being studied by the ITU
> > which seem interesting to me. I am working on a draft related to these
> > requirements.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Donald
> > ===============================
> >   Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
> >   2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
> >   d3e3e3@gmail.com
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 11:34 AM TSB SG11 Secretariat, ITU
> > <tsbsg11=40itu.int@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear colleagues,
> >>
> >> At its meeting [Virtual, 17-26 March 2021], ITU-T SG11 agreed to the
> attached liaison statement to be sent to IETF SFC.
> >>
> >> [sp16-sg11-oLS-00179]: LS on recent service function chaining related
> developments in Q4/SG11: two new draft Supplements.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Carolina.
> >> ITU-T SG11 Secretariat.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> sfc mailing list
> >> sfc@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sfc mailing list
> > sfc@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
> >
>

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status