Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Tue, 08 May 2018 12:28 UTC
Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3767712E046; Tue, 8 May 2018 05:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kOO7VTkWRSAf; Tue, 8 May 2018 05:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 100F41241FC; Tue, 8 May 2018 05:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7292; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1525782490; x=1526992090; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=zhRs9b15OPsrvBsX5HNvmzgB+Few6OOXVaJlEoo/CRM=; b=UmeZQzWnE+THR2yoH51L7lh4bpE+81EnsW3Pjfm5QSDQIVLfkyeN1Tfg gyrBVmKt6X5D3ewCfmctQ5UpfRNNlXpI+aOhUK6hsQV0xgHw7YICl4n+y ot5E9sFVWt+i28G469x0SnD004SdNrvUXXA/jShWsOt+s25WOWJwcFIQu I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D9AgD2lvFa/4MNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJNdmF6KAqDZZR2gXmBD440hmwLI4NIgQECGoJLITcVAQIBAQEBAQECbBwMhSkGHQZWEAIBCDsEAwICAjAUEQIEDgWDTQFyZA+nGYIciEWCQwWIJYFUP4EygmiDEQEBAgEBgTmDIzCCJAKYKggChWNDiCWBNYNgh02JRoZfAhETAYEkATIigVJwFTsqAYIYgkiISIU+bwEBkCOBGAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,378,1520899200"; d="scan'208,217";a="389086068"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2018 12:28:09 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (xch-rtp-020.cisco.com [64.101.220.160]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w48CS8Ro025352 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 8 May 2018 12:28:08 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 8 May 2018 08:28:08 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 8 May 2018 08:28:08 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Service Function Chaining IETF list <sfc@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org" <draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org>, "sfc-chairs@ietf.org" <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
Thread-Index: AQHT5f7YeuU5u1OwIU+x2EGVsmXRKKQmBxmA
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 12:28:08 +0000
Message-ID: <3A3D7846-A8D0-4D46-A873-5D1663DC82DD@cisco.com>
References: <152569607848.1439.13053030504229319467.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <152569607848.1439.13053030504229319467.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.150.6.154]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3A3D7846A8D04D46A8735D1663DC82DDciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/W0Fmz5NP7sCoE86HFY9EMY8XVP0>
Subject: Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 12:28:12 -0000
Hi, SFC, I support adoption of this draft as SFC WG document, as co-author. RFC 8300 already explains the importance of the proof-of-transit method for SFP Security Considerations, in particular https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8300#section-8.2.1 and https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8300#section-8.2.2, and as such a very important document for SFC to progress. Thanks, — Carlos Pignataro On May 7, 2018, at 8:27 AM, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>> wrote: The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Joel Halpern) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-proof-of-transit/ Comment: As discussed in London, and requested by the document authors, this is a two week call for adoption for this document. Reminder: the question is not whether this is done, but rather whether this is a good start on work the working group would like to advance. Please speak up. Silence is NOT consent. Given the long list of authors, the chairs particularly need to hear from non-authors. Yours, Joel (& Jim) PS: The issue of there being too many authors will be dealt with separately. That is not an obstacle to adoption, merely an annoyance to the chairs.
- [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof… IETF Secretariat
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Bernier, Daniel
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Reinaldo Penno (repenno)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… John Lemon
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Akshaya Nadahalli
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Diego R. Lopez
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Mickey Spiegel
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Purkayastha, Debashish
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Aviv Kfir
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Srihari Raghavan (srihari)