Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity

Hi Joel,

I have read the I-D and I feel that the document is ready for
publication. Authors have done a good job in clearly describing the
need and mechanism for integrity protection in NSH.

I see some control plane aspects scattered across the I-D (while
mostly out of scope), wondering if it is a good idea to consolidate
them in a section.

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:03 PM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>
> As you can see below, the SFC Chairs have started the WG last Call for
> the nsh-integrity draft.  Please respond.
> Thank you,
> Joel
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message -------
>
>
> The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity has been changed to "In WG
> Last Call" from "WG Document" by Joel Halpern:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity/
>
> Comment:
> This starts the SFC Working Group last call for the NSH integrity protection
> document.  This will run through the end of the day February 11, 2021.
> (Don't worry about time zone.  If it is still Feb 11 2021 somewhere in the
> world, you can send in comments.)  Please respond.  Silence is not consent,
> and when (if, but we hope when) we send this to the AD, we need to be
> able to
> describe meaningful WG support for the publication.  And if possible, more
> than just +1.
>
> Thank you,
> Joel (and Jim)
>
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc