IETF Logo Mail Archive

[sfc] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06.txt

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 03 June 2020 01:05 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A223A118E; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 18:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FFtQ0tvFTaYX; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 18:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C9BA3A118B; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 18:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id u16so215183lfl.8; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 18:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=XoA2tcYXSvbsl0Cm/GIuMTVgbLzpARHVFtgFe5Zr7F4=; b=rt48eICkn5yUTrv3PLS+C8/Mc+LRPOe1SOGwmmOEg/jfhyl+MsyFDFKqIAcimI447Q vFe6msjyxY6r2x4GtTuiS+nHTnbY4ZD15dPOa6I4s3sEIZRBxxE0BdTGL7RfuQ8g6oG8 ncJuUCk7GjW9qxLkE+lkMSK0ZHp8/ttCxFZxV0rcH5F64u9cIzITgQoAXqTEjdFlAOYr 4LDZU7nU3USkC5x6f9e5kY/spbez0JRcyW7rTZafJG7bEvrLExuV+XDs+FzEPB4tRVAy XzrosJJD3SkFm0bw8+4LrLxgsh3uXseb+CcDyBgvSkrx5F1kywtufvmSNXdkbJhhLD9A gPhw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=XoA2tcYXSvbsl0Cm/GIuMTVgbLzpARHVFtgFe5Zr7F4=; b=FN3nuB3XkhxzcKCzmkGmcFRkjl5TsDxkOYmNoWzot4u7lAEWtIcVM2MpYGqGSlu/gs gVmL/fW73CS2eXbggHtjAPA8sTYPaykGzsiyWmiqLE0XYrEpFdGuXmoGOustqjRQ66W2 Z7xRRQEqTcyZ5p01afMy85DK++mDcpuPATxEzn7RBExUrJ3JLTVYWZWrIq3sTIoULCX8 CI/u0hAg3VAb6d/VGUZAEIjeBtwK8/WFIpE/+MjetMuBogW/stDuZ4snBs1/IPhsLYtu 4p5+Y9+g5f1OHZWMJj0FAFx5weDg625zR0aB+hpNS1UeDKrtn3dfcit9ypRV8YvZDmqm XhRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533MVvWY0/UgRieu+JKESCVwEF75ma5da637WiQTcAF3FsJFLDHE MXlPmjWOjuzjSSDwwk1M68htlGg5ZMbWM4jmhfhEEVSV
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxRojBZ4GFiQcn0AjF9C5g9zQpAXKpn7ZbzWUGhoPYvsoUzkOkOMgRc4TVSS6oHwP4320uAVniCPUfPP3UozCU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3190:: with SMTP id i16mr1021690lfe.158.1591146339898; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 18:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159114603032.22709.3974797102414643563@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159114603032.22709.3974797102414643563@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 18:05:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmWKNwOo=Qd6uYZKNACoH9JyKdgnNP8psU+nFD=Gu+NBkA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Service Function Chaining IETF list <sfc@ietf.org>, sfc-chairs@ietf.org, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000060185505a723a0b9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/Y0D2SvtemGvsCEHEArWnaIRhjFs>
Subject: [sfc] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 01:05:44 -0000

Dear All,
this version includes the reference to the SFC OAM Framework document that
was correctly pointed out by Carlos.

Regards,
Greg

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 6:00 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06.txt
To: Cui(Linda) Wang <lindawangjoy@gmail.com>, Bhumip Khasnabish <
vumip1@gmail.com>, Wei Meng <meng.wei2@zte.com.cn>, Greg Mirsky <
gregimirsky@gmail.com>



A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06.txt
has been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam
Revision:       06
Title:          Active OAM for Service Function Chains in Networks
Document date:  2020-06-02
Group:          sfc
Pages:          18
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06

Abstract:
   A set of requirements for active Operation, Administration and
   Maintenance (OAM) of Service Function Chains (SFCs) in networks is
   presented.  Based on these requirements an encapsulation of active
   OAM message in SFC and a mechanism to detect and localize defects
   described.  Also, this document updates RFC 8300 in the definition of
   O (OAM) bit in the Network Service Header (NSH) and defines how the
   active OAM message identified in SFC NSH.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email