IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06

Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu> Tue, 09 July 2019 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ghanwani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D0512023F for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.247, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S7GzDdAaGRNF for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-f41.google.com (mail-ua1-f41.google.com [209.85.222.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9B5E12036B for <sfc@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-f41.google.com with SMTP id s4so5715619uad.7 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 17:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1B3QK4eCgyWrahKSGE7TGdmOiqVWOdghcEd/3c+ar0g=; b=U+S812xtB+fReahje+gnuSNLvg4C1f5pxwEP0tALoTVZCzcQQW3HGOhOkyl744MB1l BoopficuVRBvJYuoQg1C+AFB4MyaTw9q5BUp6dRFID5P+c+12uRHouAxgS0sflcoogFG +zDl8geU2/FRxutvA8ZtZSlrtraDNOlhsDYs98oTgbyyg5/b15C6qPNia3pRc24AuPKA NJkkFQuAIRDeBzyIvQo+yGhLg/XlVIau+L9wDtJLD0W8CG4pSQ22OxzetMjaFc53nDqT EGkHUs0L7TgeaqPMWDwRqZs/dyVwL7/vZd95vfXxJvBnWlsBpc10PGtNLcCA1XSRWX2X +NCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXwAxZvOk0jCi/zvdQYMxWbeT5eQefnxTMnhgjWDaBv+KbnQcji 0KNC5WCX0rPgr7u+82uvnN6Y2ZFVsMfBlo24eNo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqySwFAKHTS5xVfFYEyyf2OT3SVyg6XbpIMEgf5DXGSGgwlK/FI1YkmdnvQV7XxT/Qeq1IUn7o73phGb0ekThLQ=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6503:: with SMTP id w3mr11301135uam.99.1562633115874; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 17:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BYAPR13MB25978FD458B59EB22067685FD21E0@BYAPR13MB2597.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CH2PR13MB36080759DE5185750C651A2AD2F60@CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CH2PR13MB36080759DE5185750C651A2AD2F60@CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
From: Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 17:45:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+-tSzy0j6hzXUVVtPC2SODtvNJM0eCENK-Rtkr3eDnesVxZMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
Cc: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c939f1058d34dfe2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/YovUdGJmsF2ikavpsMSOqYdrAfk>
Subject: Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:45:23 -0000

I support both the framework doc (co-author) and the development of OAM
solutions for SFC.

Thanks,
Anoop

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 6:15 AM James Guichard <
james.n.guichard@futurewei.com> wrote:

> Dear WG:
>
>
>
> Before closing this WG Last Call, we (the chairs) would like to better
> understand the level of interest and commitment the WG has on progressing
> OAM work for SFC, starting with draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework as a baseline.
> Please reply to this email with either support for the document, or
> non-support (we do not need this document). Silence does not imply support
> or lack thereof so please take time to state your opinions with a brief
> rational for support/non-support.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Jim & Joel
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* James Guichard
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2019 10:30 AM
> *To:* sfc@ietf.org
> *Subject:* WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06
>
>
>
> Dear WG:
>
>
>
> This message starts a new two week WG Last Call on advancing
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework/
> <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Ce47e5eb13f224f18c46408d6e378b2f7%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C636946504868870205&sdata=lkKvAgmKik7lkqGANQpnIvBRdbjKAqYtzTUdTfB9f3Y%3D&reserved=0>
> for publication as an Informational RFC.
>
>
>
> Substantive comments and statements of support for publishing this
> document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can
> be sent to the authors.  This last call will end on 11th June 2019.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Jim & Joel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email