Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

"Bernier, Daniel" <daniel.bernier@bell.ca> Tue, 08 May 2018 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=6596d1615=daniel.bernier@bell.ca>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8573412EAE8; Tue, 8 May 2018 10:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fQZiBTcrgKWx; Tue, 8 May 2018 10:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CORP-ESA1-Wyn.bell.ca (esa1-wyn.bell.ca [67.69.243.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71A8812EABB; Tue, 8 May 2018 10:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dm5cch-d00.bellca.int.bell.ca (HELO DG1MBX01-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca) ([198.235.102.30]) by esa01corp-wyn.bell.corp.bce.ca with ESMTP; 08 May 2018 13:20:13 -0400
Received: from DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca (2002:8eb6:120e::8eb6:120e) by DG1MBX01-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca (2002:8eb6:120b::8eb6:120b) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Tue, 8 May 2018 13:20:10 -0400
Received: from DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca ([fe80::1db4:9457:85c1:6973]) by DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca ([fe80::1db4:9457:85c1:6973%22]) with mapi id 15.00.1347.000; Tue, 8 May 2018 13:20:10 -0400
From: "Bernier, Daniel" <daniel.bernier@bell.ca>
To: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>, "sfc-chairs@ietf.org" <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>, "draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org" <draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
Thread-Index: AQHT5f7X5x71ht60t0ue4SVPLlsfZKQmUPuAgAABbgD//8MLxQ==
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 17:20:10 +0000
Message-ID: <1525800010164.57786@bell.ca>
References: <152569607848.1439.13053030504229319467.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <125c9198f5634a3ca37e1fb29893bc77@XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com>, <511E0FD0-8A9A-4926-A41E-B6D765A0B7D1@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <511E0FD0-8A9A-4926-A41E-B6D765A0B7D1@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.24.25.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/aLiUH9Huuhivcbx6GbCATDkUcOM>
Subject: Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 17:20:33 -0000

I also support the adoption 

Daniel Bernier


________________________________________
From: sfc <sfc-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Reinaldo Penno (repenno) <repenno@cisco.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 12:57 PM
To: Roberta Maglione (robmgl); IETF Secretariat; draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org; sfc-chairs@ietf.org; sfc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

I support the adoption.

On 5/8/18, 9:52 AM, "sfc on behalf of Roberta Maglione (robmgl)" <sfc-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of robmgl@cisco.com> wrote:

    I support the adoption of this draft as WG item.
    Roberta


    -----Original Message-----
    From: sfc <sfc-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of IETF Secretariat
    Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 2:28 PM
    To: draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org; sfc-chairs@ietf.org; sfc@ietf.org
    Subject: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"


    The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Joel Halpern)

    The document is available at
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-proof-of-transit/

    Comment:
    As discussed in London, and requested by the document authors, this is a two week call for adoption for this document. Reminder: the question is not whether this is done, but rather whether this is a good start on work the working group would like to advance.

    Please speak up.  Silence is NOT consent.
    Given the long list of authors, the chairs particularly need to hear from non-authors.

    Yours,
    Joel (& Jim)

    PS: The issue of there being too many authors will be dealt with separately.
    That is not an obstacle to adoption, merely an annoyance to the chairs.

    _______________________________________________
    sfc mailing list
    sfc@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

    _______________________________________________
    sfc mailing list
    sfc@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc


_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc