Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt
meng.wei2@zte.com.cn Tue, 02 November 2021 02:02 UTC
Return-Path: <meng.wei2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A153A084F for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_NONELEMENT_30_40=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id undN38fogPCB for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 153853A084B for <sfc@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.238]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id B3BADA88000D2DD817D5; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 10:02:24 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kjyxapp01.zte.com.cn ([10.30.12.200]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 1A221mk2092113; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 10:02:18 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from meng.wei2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (kjyxapp06[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid16; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 10:02:18 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 10:02:18 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2b0861809c2ae39c0185
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202111021002181121996@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <e89dc949-cd19-f63c-a5cd-3b94af2cb4f9@joelhalpern.com>
References: 163466112750.7235.4587641153411151399@ietfa.amsl.com, CA+RyBmXVKkEfNx707k9qXk1HoPNQg2EG8RhSM75TL-nbGJ6RoQ@mail.gmail.com, e89dc949-cd19-f63c-a5cd-3b94af2cb4f9@joelhalpern.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: meng.wei2@zte.com.cn
To: jmh@joelhalpern.com
Cc: gregimirsky@gmail.com, sfc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 1A221mk2092113
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/cA_A27tnugOidaF9WytVsDBnZ9w>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 02:02:33 -0000
Dear SFC Chairs & all, I support the publication of this draft. I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Best Regards, Wei Meng Director of Standard and Open Source Planning Technology Planning Dept./System Product ZTE Corporation NO 50, Ruanjian AVE, Nanjing, P.R.China, 210012 T: +86 25 88014635 M: +86 13584013108 E: meng.wei2@zte.com.cn www.zte.com.cn 原始邮件 发件人:JoelM.Halpern 收件人:Greg Mirsky;Service Function Chaining IETF list; 日 期 :2021年10月20日 02:03 主 题 :Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt While we are conducting the last call, and deciding who will shepherd this document... 1) If anyone would like to shepherd it, please let me or Jim know. 2) Would the authors and key contributors please confirm to the lsit that all known relevant IPR has been disclosed. Thank you, Joel On 10/19/2021 12:39 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote: > Dear Jim and Joel, > we've completed merging the substantive parts of two SFC OAM drafts. > Many thanks to Med for his thorough reviews, thoughtful comments that > helped us improve the document. The authors believe that the draft is > stable and is ready for the WG LC. We greatly appreciate your > consideration of starting the WG LC and are committed to addressing > questions and comments. > > Regards, > Greg (on behalf off the authors) > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>> > Date: Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 9:33 AM > Subject: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt > To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>> > Cc: <sfc@ietf.org <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>> > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Service Function Chaining WG of the IETF. > > Title : Active OAM for Service Function Chaining > Authors : Greg Mirsky > Wei Meng > Ting Ao > Kent Leung > Gyan Mishra > Filename : draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.txt > Pages : 37 > Date : 2021-10-19 > > Abstract: > A set of requirements for active Operation, Administration, and > Maintenance (OAM) of Service Function Chains (SFCs) in a network is > presented in this document. Based on these requirements, an > encapsulation of active OAM messages in SFC and a mechanism to detect > and localize defects are described. > > This document updates RFC 8300. Particularly, it updates the > definition of O (OAM) bit in the Network Service Header (NSH) (RFC > 8300) and defines how an active OAM message is identified in the NSH. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/> > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.html > <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16.html> > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16 > <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-16> > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/> > > > _______________________________________________ > sfc mailing list > sfc@ietf.org <mailto:sfc@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc> _______________________________________________ sfc mailing list sfc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
- [sfc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-… internet-drafts
- [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-l… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-l… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-l… Gyan Mishra
- [sfc] Fwd: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-l… meng.wei2
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-l… Linda Wang
- Re: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-l… Gyan Mishra
- [sfc] Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-m… Greg Mirsky
- [sfc] Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-m… Greg Mirsky
- [sfc] Fwd: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-multi-… Donald Eastlake
- [sfc] Fwd: Please Respond on IPR in your Internet… Donald Eastlake