Re: [sfc] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06.txt

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Wed, 03 June 2020 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B2F3A11DA; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=XOJYH21G; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=uoVkdLnl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24Mjtf1yn_Wu; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD0C93A11D8; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10598; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1591149624; x=1592359224; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=zzX6uiGAllx6RQN6U28mVFfuvqudWDQrhvLmRUAcVxM=; b=XOJYH21GRbxm0xDjCHKnI0G5BokZZDlOtuS8W/f0K/5u0VReCWSkieB0 ejn/lE4INMJ4d9xPRCHBCtb8a+bocz2SY/q3UMRQ8kY9lOXiudQmOlx2+ fO4Q1mFQCXEr29luhwK2BMsVajo1z8aL4/CwVI4dJEJp9/n/WQygJ3dE6 4=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 873
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:LJfsehxSUPwWQJTXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5ZRWDt/pohV7NG47c7qEMh+nXtvXmXmoNqdaEvWsZeZNBHxkClY0NngMmDcLEbC+zLPPjYyEgWsgXUlhj8iK0NEFUHID1YFiB6nG35CQZTxP4Mwc9L+/pG4nU2sKw0e36+5DabwhSwjSnZrYnJxStpgKXvc4T0oY=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DbAQDWA9de/4sNJK1mGwEBAQEBAQEBBQEBARIBAQEDAwEBAYIKgVJSB29YLywKhBuDRgONRYl9iWmEaIFCgRADVQQHAQEBCQMBASUIAgQBAYREAoIbAiQ4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FWwyFcgEBAQECARIRHQEBNQIBBAsCAQYCEQMBAigDAgIhERQJCAIEDgUODQeDBAGCSwMOIAEOkziQZwKBOYhhdoEygwEBAQWBNgIOQUKCXA0LggcHCYE4gVOBEYlnGoFBP4E4HIJNPoIeSQEBAgEBGIEPWg0RglYzgi2ObgaJVYEMiV+PYUwKglmEIoJTgT6IXoMBhF8egmeBFId1kkGaYoJOjW2DTAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBQCoigVZwFRpLAYI+CTUSFwINkEAMF4NPhRSFQnQCNQIGAQcBAQMJfIsuAYEPAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,466,1583193600"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="518943435"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 03 Jun 2020 01:59:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0531xn95012861 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 3 Jun 2020 01:59:49 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 20:59:49 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 20:59:48 -0500
Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 20:59:48 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=KEOZoL1yKOc2cGFYbuAT1QWxIMJ/bSQrIv2EYl1ZOjLwi7irFiRn0uPO1uF7IQOR0aRGbNdoPbgZ2xI6vnr9zmL1ITHrZkqHFhZVEKqCrg2S32rrXinRgQclcEITKOAVAzouhudm5hSj5U3t5WJUBoS6/42HmWPPLS/okNdnh5DivmhiBrC7Tyyx88bA+vygASmwg+ee9eTQPV5kh/9cwdJIuITFZoLwoUWILSGnBWb86mfilaI+4axXzDL9FOzGM4avAqyCueVrlPleS7ExRb2YO9uUUpvwq6UzarLRBREuH3ElvDqpz1GrGL+ZfrsGAw+ScVyAlBrCWOdMZCIn6Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hRcQl0JZgjgPj7v5EF/BEh1vdl/WVB5bDVFe9e9o9Wk=; b=gbRSB5pTwg13coUT3AhGrNtlhJLoDI+QS52VOxb5jQeJh7ocen2eHI2VBWZWiq53Zi9Vh2mA4HktTUkYg5vlFw/N3GajifVrv+cY7ERpX4B6Goaj/8E1HozVxadsx7qUtTJeBOc6+xf4d+6+PXaMihInbKT9M1MnbyJqjZy92RWjNon8qvwTvhG3020c7FvGk6ynO/Eyi4xSR7NSTRhu8iSYWXR5EL96wEmPI3pOidJF2qEJGRVxX35XbRRQ4BmQAPLjpUUKQzpG2g0HzPk07ggurEdj5gV++z81YWtuH6RKWfi+1tvBo2HElxlYZN92RjsiyBUCtb2ZD4wAvBYDcQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hRcQl0JZgjgPj7v5EF/BEh1vdl/WVB5bDVFe9e9o9Wk=; b=uoVkdLnlfWHNCAAe8pmzYj4qgAZ+M3aPZDU8Wt8ZhbqdkUz0kBnyoWZYzZF31LgM5sOiaZtIQRXGYdH0Z9Alb+hSSK0GkG6ldGa2KWSBYFjVRuNd/AapH57lBJASuEjD93QauugWLz/KSQX/1Z5Kjh0KFVCr7+W5q5iOuGl2U7k=
Received: from BN8PR11MB3635.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:86::20) by BN8PR11MB3780.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:90::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3066.18; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 01:59:45 +0000
Received: from BN8PR11MB3635.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c0e8:9942:9972:5590]) by BN8PR11MB3635.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c0e8:9942:9972:5590%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3045.024; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 01:59:45 +0000
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
CC: Service Function Chaining IETF list <sfc@ietf.org>, "sfc-chairs@ietf.org" <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06.txt
Thread-Index: AQHWOUMcq40kdZuRPUW/Tlap0IF7CKjGIsiA
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 01:59:45 +0000
Message-ID: <956416F6-006F-47D4-B10E-6FCD08886C6C@cisco.com>
References: <159114603032.22709.3974797102414643563@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+RyBmWKNwOo=Qd6uYZKNACoH9JyKdgnNP8psU+nFD=Gu+NBkA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmWKNwOo=Qd6uYZKNACoH9JyKdgnNP8psU+nFD=Gu+NBkA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [136.56.129.159]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b81b602d-750a-4020-e97a-08d80761ca1e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN8PR11MB3780:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN8PR11MB37802C1DD2B5368F9C83EC15C7880@BN8PR11MB3780.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 04238CD941
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 7SF29cIir6DjfHM3G3hjMGeYLApJEQsf4sttD7Yw+0p3IuFRq1Kdmp+Y4FTzGkI0A8E6S6jSpAN2GqRed9L05owwI3D8BPEZYdq8zYAjJBCRbUj2UmOLx2njnN66wfIMHIIT6ybh2Y8MwRu2nCeJs0dv+ycbL+slmx42rKVhJQfOlf79Pzea3BosYyswtGZc/8vwUF3a/kMnXAELefzBeiQeKNjUJGgKdZ+jpUdqyBLJg9m0lInu4gxtE23YRYQBNUz6TxTt9pRk77YsCbkfbMED7jlVxhEPqC8qSExaJcx2UPkQXp2WPxVXa8XpAr73sgWr7YNeoSHKYpF5X8cPFBQzywykSMQrSWHBmMMi9pmwoGGpjGLzHuYT0SePXaY8XNm7qQeOpvF6i35EwL+QJQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN8PR11MB3635.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(366004)(376002)(346002)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(6486002)(5660300002)(2616005)(6512007)(6916009)(99936003)(36756003)(26005)(186003)(53546011)(6506007)(4326008)(71200400001)(66476007)(66616009)(66946007)(478600001)(64756008)(66556008)(76116006)(91956017)(66446008)(966005)(2906002)(33656002)(15650500001)(86362001)(166002)(54906003)(316002)(66574014)(83380400001)(8676002)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: a7psfnA5LFII/wMZKF+IPayZrd8OabEFKS1UGjAa4+pZficuYwMHUgvw7QNfnjgZbtcowMT6bxIU2qp7Ov/joDwiTOu2L0zIjKz4cGjU8dGkhAZZy7T9C7YcfyGpnu3zL0cRPlHCv6ArncEMElYN4Sa1kkQjsixOSARnSfQdPZLuDhxWWfvQ8GFMpe76NfrJg3+/QBeNx8CAGFt/4ZIhI0OfzLyXEmI33dAQtJXoJ2zB/5QIAtgAFygixtcbYYYgKZdo6BgYa+ktVBZEs4gMYyhg6P/oZk0FIVoGgyAzSmF4ZeUgqZ+efhVIEHjQpzZrX26vgcL1Z7jbgd23RN+pwLbotvPcn+HK4nU8Qx6FmJskbQc1OjRSxth8pAIsOhG9ktpHOqdGo6Y0fxb3aNgaLXpXJNubJI9JvN5R60xwD0cvljc4x5XofWYyqOfuXtJ0V3Koe4imGScp6jpaT/txkDwCJGm4fDos2veeNYsWsF+RT5FFfb+KW0v0hsL624DO
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9D020B42-3A75-495A-973C-C8B52132D7F3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b81b602d-750a-4020-e97a-08d80761ca1e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Jun 2020 01:59:45.5131 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: +NdKzZqvoli4C504ASq0UMdQWGpy/wDgPh9Iionsbh4v7UjxI4HtuQkS5+N7PI5Ovbaajst/TdSFusXUE3fcEA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR11MB3780
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/cTSsXkkPef8507vbYbIKrCGip_w>
Subject: Re: [sfc] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 02:00:27 -0000

Dear Greg,

Let me correct what I pointed out.

I did NOT point out that a reference / citation to the SFC OAM Framework was missing.

I DID point out that this is a solution over engineered in a corner without consideration for the work done on the framework.

An after-the-fact reference does not fix that :-)

Best,

Carlos.

> 2020/06/02 午後9:05、Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>のメール:
> 
> Dear All,
> this version includes the reference to the SFC OAM Framework document that was correctly pointed out by Carlos.
> 
> Regards,
> Greg
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>
> Date: Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 6:00 PM
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06.txt
> To: Cui(Linda) Wang <lindawangjoy@gmail.com <mailto:lindawangjoy@gmail.com>>, Bhumip Khasnabish <vumip1@gmail.com <mailto:vumip1@gmail.com>>, Wei Meng <meng.wei2@zte.com.cn <mailto:meng.wei2@zte.com.cn>>, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com <mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>>
> 
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:           draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam
> Revision:       06
> Title:          Active OAM for Service Function Chains in Networks
> Document date:  2020-06-02
> Group:          sfc
> Pages:          18
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06.txt <https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06.txt>
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/>
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06>
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam>
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06 <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam-06>
> 
> Abstract:
>    A set of requirements for active Operation, Administration and
>    Maintenance (OAM) of Service Function Chains (SFCs) in networks is
>    presented.  Based on these requirements an encapsulation of active
>    OAM message in SFC and a mechanism to detect and localize defects
>    described.  Also, this document updates RFC 8300 in the definition of
>    O (OAM) bit in the Network Service Header (NSH) and defines how the
>    active OAM message identified in SFC NSH.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org/>.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
>