IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Mon, 08 July 2019 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0762120178 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 06:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iEB3Df_9oVfY for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 06:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F123120165 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 06:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar07.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.9]) by opfedar21.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 45j5q71RdFz7tZp; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 15:27:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.45]) by opfedar07.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 45j5q70Cy1z5vPR; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 15:27:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e878:bd0:c89e:5b42]) by OPEXCAUBM42.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 15:23:56 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06
Thread-Index: AQHVFWHG6SZyvEyD3EGGLNC6v36bBKbA8JWQgAAEtiA=
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 13:23:55 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302EAC5A4F@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <BYAPR13MB25978FD458B59EB22067685FD21E0@BYAPR13MB2597.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CH2PR13MB36080759DE5185750C651A2AD2F60@CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CH2PR13MB36080759DE5185750C651A2AD2F60@CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.245]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302EAC5A4FOPEXCAUBMA2corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/gnoFRmWr2BZmJIf1IIdOWTie_2k>
Subject: Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 13:27:51 -0000

Hi Jim, all,

I do support this effort. This is IMHO one of the missing pieces (in addition to standardizing key metadata TLVs).

Cheers,
Med

De : sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de James Guichard
Envoyé : lundi 8 juillet 2019 15:15
À : sfc@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06

Dear WG:

Before closing this WG Last Call, we (the chairs) would like to better understand the level of interest and commitment the WG has on progressing OAM work for SFC, starting with draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework as a baseline. Please reply to this email with either support for the document, or non-support (we do not need this document). Silence does not imply support or lack thereof so please take time to state your opinions with a brief rational for support/non-support.

Thanks!

Jim & Joel


From: James Guichard
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 10:30 AM
To: sfc@ietf.org
Subject: WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06


Dear WG:



This message starts a new two week WG Last Call on advancing https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework/<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Ce47e5eb13f224f18c46408d6e378b2f7%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C636946504868870205&sdata=lkKvAgmKik7lkqGANQpnIvBRdbjKAqYtzTUdTfB9f3Y%3D&reserved=0> for publication as an Informational RFC.



Substantive comments and statements of support for publishing this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.  This last call will end on 11th June 2019.



Thanks!



Jim & Joel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email