Re: [sfc] IETF SFC - Liaison statement from ITU-T SG11: LS on recent service function chaining related developments in Q4/SG11: two new draft Supplements

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Wed, 30 June 2021 05:28 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE523A090D for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 22:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DXiB-Gkuj7e8 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 22:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x129.google.com (mail-il1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0124D3A0917 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 22:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x129.google.com with SMTP id i17so1699800ilj.11 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 22:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KRBPHNm5RKUZPr+926F6ovKEW60LHarDyo41DDve9Dk=; b=otO44abnTQr9fV6f/buYBocKCdPmtx4lBB4BYbL3xm8zhO4vy7pJxw/5KVPUCTGrX+ m0v6sc/vVPWoT3hNlMloSonO09gaOQBwkSFTA1L65OiuL99ZMPWKNNVP0U7svqxbZWIy r5AI9BYo3ZqzyvtYRpCaANoyN1YfbCleAt7uGjdAYZqqIuiJXad85Y2UqE3Zr78OEsDm 4C7jCQbZ0tkl/KKJtCibjrbp2A3CEMAqAZsCIb4ww0gpWSMBK/8KPVDB85xnLneeJ0E6 t3J4iHZ9C+BWlen0aJ0KkBBPO6rc+hFY/f7U1GU3/V112bkpm1MKUxlc1wR9JoctqtLr ONww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=KRBPHNm5RKUZPr+926F6ovKEW60LHarDyo41DDve9Dk=; b=MaRYOhcgMnLeM1MiASTVsb+X1BYBITXXZ1eYmWJdA1fWcqzFKZdlfFs16sRUCSSztD mXTuzeQj5kvbP6YR0ok4QVJeYXHBHYFoO+K/5Mr5c4Zo/+tLEmNmU/NQ/y2Mafj0wOmu p4asSLkjulDxd1viUlSl1003bt/UFGJU7/DjOOWqVXpJNr9fdh9BoWnc3Qv5oGcnLv4w 22JhSlbEHH8ZEiQbgWZd9ytZglmTp1yXlU4hjYTebi5iHxPBf12KppHF4wrLxAkMKGgn 9jAoxzAHfh8uXq8w5fMc/9GpE1hDTkTYj7N/5ZARdZARkSOXpFq+RzDfgFJroO0UaPFC qprQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530CRplN9pWGeSTezt0ktTK2LpYay1CBJ8Bbv5Gagpfkh3VURLV9 h1FGFWTVVbSCldrbXCEe+CaQjnkaq00bF0SSAu5z315UB/k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyNcUXevjaXzyLvgQdGwHzWcq9GKPBzDhmdT1bbmzsWayzgLWCuytL5VuAk6Ow3QgmQSs92GeRTkvVI1pX7w3s=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:6f07:: with SMTP id k7mr13963640ilc.276.1625030901280; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 22:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <GV0P278MB054400B2E91A1255F882553ABE759@GV0P278MB0544.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <GV0P278MB054400B2E91A1255F882553ABE759@GV0P278MB0544.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 01:28:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHtKCJLkw-jq0VBqJ0kpr-H1GCq8dXsE3J+Va55J1Pjxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/hGMrlHv0JL6wKKL1QRRjc_hDQEU>
Subject: Re: [sfc] IETF SFC - Liaison statement from ITU-T SG11: LS on recent service function chaining related developments in Q4/SG11: two new draft Supplements
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 05:28:26 -0000

I have reviewed this Liaison from the ITU and attachments. It speaks
of Service Function Chaining requirements being studied by the ITU
which seem interesting to me. I am working on a draft related to these
requirements.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 11:34 AM TSB SG11 Secretariat, ITU
<tsbsg11=40itu.int@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> At its meeting [Virtual, 17-26 March 2021], ITU-T SG11 agreed to the attached liaison statement to be sent to IETF SFC.
>
> [sp16-sg11-oLS-00179]: LS on recent service function chaining related developments in Q4/SG11: two new draft Supplements.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Carolina.
> ITU-T SG11 Secretariat.
>
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc