Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

"Srihari Raghavan (srihari)" <srihari@cisco.com> Wed, 30 May 2018 09:47 UTC

Return-Path: <srihari@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C7312E03D; Wed, 30 May 2018 02:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UeE1pvkZeP2z; Wed, 30 May 2018 02:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9806D12DA04; Wed, 30 May 2018 02:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10302; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1527673648; x=1528883248; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=r9vsapgi1+jeWTTtuUlbLOddQg6KxawPIsjXFEUcBKo=; b=F6FvIZXJvsk2WV+xXwXvSJZk3XVHtJXTMx9jGQUpp95MmmYo5qiJz90A yTtgCisK4sJiVK0mQosR5RFxnjeX2FfzQru0ethqwxBqK4qk3dOQiCWUZ cYGb+SVfJHJxDb90FoX87KoTr2QalvStK2HUotdQjl2KWSnMmJyjD8MHF g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BCAwDfcA5b/40NJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJOdmJ/MoNtlGSBWCGBD45EhnALI4NIgQEZggQhNxUBAgEBAQEBAQJsHAELhSkGHQYKTBIBCDsHAgQwJwQOgycCgRtkD6URghyIQ4FjBYg2ghOBMwyCXYMRAgMBgTmDIzCCJAKYZAkChWqIdIE7g2+HXolwhnoCERMBgSQzIoFScBU7KgGCGYJHiEiFPo9egRkBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,460,1520899200"; d="scan'208,217";a="122142054"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 May 2018 09:47:27 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-006.cisco.com (xch-rtp-006.cisco.com [64.101.220.146]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w4U9lRGE031415 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 May 2018 09:47:27 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-008.cisco.com (64.101.220.148) by XCH-RTP-006.cisco.com (64.101.220.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 30 May 2018 05:47:27 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-008.cisco.com ([64.101.220.148]) by XCH-RTP-008.cisco.com ([64.101.220.148]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 30 May 2018 05:47:27 -0400
From: "Srihari Raghavan (srihari)" <srihari@cisco.com>
To: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
CC: "sfc-chairs@ietf.org" <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
Thread-Index: AQHT9/s3Ed7Mg3zmPU+I0X+j16GX1A==
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 09:47:26 +0000
Message-ID: <FCA540E7-797B-4819-9A2F-50D67E67056A@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.143.26.19]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FCA540E7797B48199A2F50D67E67056Aciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/j68pRmLmrmQQerwi5--g977veQE>
Subject: Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 09:47:31 -0000

Support (as an implementer and after going through the document).

Thanks
Srihari

>>>>>

The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state

Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Joel Halpern)



The document is available at

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-proof-of-transit/



Comment:

As discussed in London, and requested by the document authors, this is a two

week call for adoption for this document. Reminder: the question is not

whether this is done, but rather whether this is a good start on work the

working group would like to advance.



Please speak up.  Silence is NOT consent.

Given the long list of authors, the chairs particularly need to hear from

non-authors.



Yours,

Joel (& Jim)



PS: The issue of there being too many authors will be dealt with separately.

That is not an obstacle to adoption, merely an annoyance to the chairs.