Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam-packet-00.txt
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 16 February 2022 15:13 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454A63A1373
for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 07:13:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id j-TgfBvp0xoH for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 16 Feb 2022 07:13:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 803023A136E
for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 07:13:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id w3so4440710edu.8
for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 07:13:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=SjPMSLUSQ4ArOLRbw0P8AbSZmnPYaj/6fhBZCxm7LvQ=;
b=Ebenhw5VtHckC3pI1FdSU6vT/xqFyUSdCeK1vMiQagxlAgkDlLB+Y6eeVidZn1NRFS
G2B0wL/bNV/GOAvB5+eeFsUA6gtjytrwKnZxj4Dt1jggSCWmZ8GWuhn5ojrNe3JYr+4L
BCT40Sts7K1J4UOedqBgx+RNMWr8ptWpwkTpuKTskF+ebGQEUs5qB7OxZeawSteVFyBV
24Tho5QOWsKSbySHksgoWF5kP/+VTINX+KvTeiXlCxDeDL6CYqINNGiBBjcvJQ5crjQv
plZK4LVU0JD03U7U2HUdPmGo/vOyeRr+n06L248U2F4WXYyr2m3pBNCENHGk54oHlTBo
rrzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=SjPMSLUSQ4ArOLRbw0P8AbSZmnPYaj/6fhBZCxm7LvQ=;
b=VJsiokapAbhiQVXWpG/xQ64xBMWFxAvCV+JpZIWqAJedpclp4EZ0eGaBYnSgaF/GnV
G9w97Eq7D+cs82/Yan/JH5/R0adAkdzL6iPPlW2w2frOPmNEhGDvgneOtk4R+KCzt0xm
aMbVl+LvpEKOgb1/V9S/mb1o/F8IBXUhsqcQnKWxWsRUG1dtgpipnaGRA7JO5rJ2NjRL
gT0heGy9Ivdc0zCQJ2BokPgzpwtgC+Pd1YZl/ATtHgfgfXsoFWjDx1dem8pUOiB/8F7E
7ON5HpGwo4+EO3QcYdGRJ+J6jZ0Dt1uX0l1F7MM5Asb1a8Ek+R1s+hix2U2pUGtf7hid
/HtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wSW/vD6rjJ/N4FxGoRC/sr73y1tBWPAMh/MbqtzB3Gcn6Pgff
A2WX9EWiKVnGx7YOG9xqHYhr32aFJR6Xmh+buQIU1+Uo0ks=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy20dRUvXsSptoofPu8SJ7rAbIiJCQvSsItphuGW7+IEp09UwXuVEg8Ghj4ttRE47E2KzT2HsKS56+ORsOo09A=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:51cb:b0:409:e99f:bc1c with SMTP id
r11-20020a05640251cb00b00409e99fbc1cmr3493864edd.68.1645024403814; Wed, 16
Feb 2022 07:13:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164502226599.23621.11371897310173936133@ietfa.amsl.com>
<14238_1645022412_620D0CCC_14238_64_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035494D1E@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <14238_1645022412_620D0CCC_14238_64_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035494D1E@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 07:13:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXTSUdfovvnSpQjoo_Svwm-amC-bRm0eyscUHgY2hYx9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Med Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Cc: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003c7c6605d8241732"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/mqeBAoDtlaY7U6al9zEmGbiGMCU>
Subject: Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam-packet-00.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>,
<mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>,
<mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 15:13:32 -0000
Hi Med,
many thanks for taking the lead and putting the proposal on the table.
I have a question on the proposed new text for the O bit and its possible
effect on IOAM:
O bit: Setting this bit indicates an SFC OAM packet. Such a packet
is any NSH-encapasulated packet that exclusively includes an OAM
command and/or OAM data.
My understanding of the new definition of the O bit is that the NSH
includes and/or encapsulates only OAM command and/or data. IOAM, as I
understand its application in NSH, may follow the NSH and have user payload
after the IOAM data.
And another scenario, if Flow ID TLV is used to influence user data through
SFP, OAM will apply the same Flow ID value. Would such packet still be
considered as "exclusively includes OAM command and/or data"?
Regards,
Greg
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 6:40 AM <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A proposal to clarify the intent of SFC OAM packet. Comments are welcome.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : I-D-Announce <i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org> De la part de
> internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Envoyé : mercredi 16 février 2022 15:38
> À : i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Objet : I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam-packet-00.txt
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>
>
> Title : Clarifying Ambiguity related to Network Service
> Header (NSH) OAM Packet
> Author : Mohamed Boucadair
> Filename : draft-boucadair-sfc-oam-packet-00.txt
> Pages : 5
> Date : 2022-02-16
>
> Abstract:
> This document clarifies an ambiguity in the Network Service Header
> (NSH) specification related to the handling of O-bit. In particular,
> this document clarifies the meaning of "OAM packet".
>
> This document updates RFC8300.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-sfc-oam-packet/
>
> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-boucadair-sfc-oam-packet-00
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org:
> :internet-drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>
- [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam-pac… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam-pac… James Guichard
- Re: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam-pac… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] TR: I-D Action: draft-boucadair-sfc-oam… Greg Mirsky