IETF Logo Mail Archive

[sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Thu, 28 January 2021 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EA53A15A3 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:32:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t_4rvUEoaiJd for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:32:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA9443A152C for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:32:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DRPcP5F0Vz6G9X0 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:32:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1611847973; bh=g12hL6NewOYLiy9L8Wc9Ph0ytvfdj94aJPu60BzRjFM=; h=Subject:References:To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=hfXPe1yEniaW3WweJZG0FflssFz7K5JVbwq0u7mZlP3b1haPoSEEre5p4DJwnLeEN J8wJalhPoTRbgcPUHf8dMqKXbF47QM7iDxLcK2dlI/zTyAyosGfYSSLfqfvtGHm9gT E1IFMbnX12+uEwl4HGh2ia17o0t3NsaCn2TZ6XQw=
X-Quarantine-ID: <hxJUZbNbk9aF>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.128.43] (unknown [50.225.209.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DRPcP2JDXz6GBB6 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:32:53 -0800 (PST)
References: <161184769798.6893.13499187160157088449@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <161184769798.6893.13499187160157088449@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <48b9f1db-38cb-7703-3c1e-7d2e75f93d19@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:32:52 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <161184769798.6893.13499187160157088449@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/qJGHAQJ-iMVyhiYZbSGV4YOSr88>
Subject: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:32:55 -0000

As you can see below, the SFC Chairs have started the WG last Call for 
the nsh-integrity draft.  Please respond.
Thank you,
Joel


-------- Forwarded Message -------


The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity has been changed to "In WG
Last Call" from "WG Document" by Joel Halpern:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity/

Comment:
This starts the SFC Working Group last call for the NSH integrity protection
document.  This will run through the end of the day February 11, 2021. 
(Don't worry about time zone.  If it is still Feb 11 2021 somewhere in the
world, you can send in comments.)  Please respond.  Silence is not consent,
and when (if, but we hope when) we send this to the AD, we need to be 
able to
describe meaningful WG support for the publication.  And if possible, more
than just +1.

Thank you,
Joel (and Jim)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email