[sfc] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-02.txt
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 12 September 2017 08:22 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4099313235C; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 01:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6iNPkkw5Qlyy; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 01:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29DAA124B18; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 01:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l196so24367834lfl.1; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 01:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OgppNPadQ0PgKxiQmAdtPsTM0Q9pguun4OY+94QU1wY=; b=kneNhDhytolQKAHtsPcarB6nhr5M2OeM3zja05WAlWP92z3SokNvuGxsjiF1Ezx9vc on89L1Rzfk4faI20a6N2jAqeut6+jkG7xe8VXdwdnq5edbaSFoQ9id4RtoW29mfdnv6g 1sHr9vn9d3g8nyQyGlzND270NpX9onuDkeDlHkdj2uHGhK0gNoHZA/lD335H6RVgw4EZ 845c5JA2QN7dPnnefpNT3p7VWwLWDC6tnNEhmmETSvf9sveaJSxBwJ1Eh1HMAjseRT5h MftaTyRo+nQdEPvFhIQyFdn23nNvAB2eGpabnPmnjQG01mGNvBDxuHSueLDB7xGMJg7Z uQow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OgppNPadQ0PgKxiQmAdtPsTM0Q9pguun4OY+94QU1wY=; b=WBshnbhrlyKNsp2Nzdjjd7c+HE2ffymFJ2YSwMd38+UWj8j0hXEYjPP1dOpsqgnqr7 xqqTa0aw1GBAX7RbH4RFVrEC+WsijpPDBf/g3ldrokhvZ8fLvSvn22Sg6JrD0Fvwu+Gr dthX4B90K1O6l0SujnmSScx41PkOHJOr8JfYtjw4iiHbhshkiMN/H+1lkIdGkJv/6XQB 0ZAHoFc79T7HSrz1nnpF+9MAbkIxGv5TmY53oGxM7PfaPWEC4uuyJtSkMQzGIdPKXbYu eDdiAZLRKFTzOhnbm/44g9+l04eGmxnupCeBK2PK6e9+FIWeZdkglePVEyh0ri2HVE7g kn9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgrX05l3wJhqgTYk6dR6htniXTZPRb2fGZ8mmcuz8Y+Iw+vwjU4 K1oEzEToPqp1KQeV5gvdFF1at9EcsFPw
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCmzzbNh0r16eDBen24WYjA9aVVsGmotKZWnU1i/gPqBy5alYByE3Wt1mNKWE1cTtAyJlvMjMJx0nqHWQb3nuM=
X-Received: by 10.25.145.66 with SMTP id y2mr3883188lfj.102.1505204547001; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 01:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.32.201 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 01:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <150520423416.4597.11034144420561105867.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <150520423416.4597.11034144420561105867.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 01:22:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVD3t4Eo-Z+S12Qx1u2g9G5=WddM7xGvVyzUJrLQHSWQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: sfc@ietf.org
Cc: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1cd53a56a3b20558f9be42"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/rBgnL5dWEyQ-bxHsjGWjmSrtzos>
Subject: [sfc] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-02.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 08:22:31 -0000
Dear All, we've updated the Performance Measurement (PM) with Alternate Marking Method in Service Function Chaining (SFC) Domain document with: - align flag naming in the Mark field with PM functionality rather than AMM mode; - added case of Residence Time Measurement using AMM at SFF with nodal and sub-nodal scopes. Your reviews, comments, suggestions always greatly appreciated. Authors believe that the document is ready and would like to ask the WG consider adoption of this work. Regards, Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> Date: Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 1:17 AM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-02.txt To: Gregory Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, Giuseppe Fioccola < giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it>, Tal Mizrahi <talmi@marvell.com> A new version of I-D, draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm Revision: 02 Title: Performance Measurement (PM) with Alternate Marking Method in Service Function Chaining (SFC) Domain Document date: 2017-09-12 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 8 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm- 02.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-02 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mirsky-sfc- pmamm-02 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-02 Abstract: This document describes how the alternate marking method be used as the passive performance measurement method in a Service Function Chaining (SFC) domain. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat