IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Akshaya Nadahalli <akshaya@rtbrick.com> Mon, 14 May 2018 07:16 UTC

Return-Path: <akshaya@rtbrick.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF0D12D7F5 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2018 00:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtbrick.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QaBFHyXp9Rhb for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2018 00:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x234.google.com (mail-pl0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D8CF12D7EC for <sfc@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2018 00:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x234.google.com with SMTP id c11-v6so6827280plr.5 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2018 00:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtbrick.com; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:mime-version; bh=toBgXDyj9/S0UVTzTTNb1F2CftLarw2fg/Ehxej25rk=; b=l+r96JF/Gis/kPtctD/nS7yayKGOmMqFjire4sxX4ZrQzyTVREQxwkWmMt5b0YDxzL UfFd6MJ914n1pjDlH7LMxhFkvBgtrPuGBJElfgVASKsqdr5qUH3cauhbGoQQuHrHxT7A bUTFkWckwATqN0N2HwPEphJpTxnQMBRnrZ9cA61C20oZLUD/Xq7Id2415a36qwWqiqg8 Y+pOuDl7LhodD1ksr5dBo8TlriVBEagAe0rczPD1LQMBy2z4uYvYynTEyXRoUEZW6P5L lN+HX5KQmBkO4dvWBx0f0buWCBTb1ui7BqD4OUi8qnIH4qeWiqNcjuLhpH87in13DIuw rhiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:mime-version; bh=toBgXDyj9/S0UVTzTTNb1F2CftLarw2fg/Ehxej25rk=; b=GmnxdvzxZd973ZMxl5g87Rogvf1vUbIcwLkXMFbLZa3/iNzEGw9zE/IJGODv+JWRBi XJV2TJwaSSewkiJQv5qs5BfZyK1vPIPIOnjM/wD0BUmpEOBSBvAbsqpXLWKs1GJ0P9J/ dBcNuS1TWgX3z4rH2tjuynd6nDqz9aa+McnW7suSFGzYRXFV9J411g7htMTiNevH//qC BKn6lCxU8IMD+njK04zOENAJfi88JfAwaIPiZbLrH0W8dUQsdKVYuG171BNXpj1jb92B hWZlnFOSq4mBtF2/mpL3cR+B78nA/z2iassVq2HMfc2owSrBXO/myGIsL8QIpoMwECxk 4WPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwce+Q4kQLj59BQWu93pqyqPVTFKKlzPdAbD6XIDQ20+PJrFOpxW K0Dlovdzu39Cd8Afnec2+UTeVw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoXdptw5kkffy9VUJgzPW6zaMixjg4gNgkCcZYBgM3cl/AsCWGrVtA5sVEE98c0kIjh1155PA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b942:: with SMTP id h2-v6mr8885770pls.312.1526282192438; Mon, 14 May 2018 00:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.31.83] ([61.1.213.101]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t131-v6sm1291242pgc.34.2018.05.14.00.16.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 May 2018 00:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1526282186.3465.4.camel@akshay-ThinkPad-E460>
From: Akshaya Nadahalli <akshaya@rtbrick.com>
To: ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org, sfc-chairs@ietf.org, draft-brockners-sfc-ioam-nsh@ietf.org, sfc@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 12:46:26 +0530
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-GlFaiMVAqT7ZJbOkNdRs"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/rSUgX2x4ExOhDdg5zMjnkspTESM>
Subject: Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 07:16:36 -0000

I support the adoption of this draft as SFC WG document.


-- 

Regards,
Akshaya N 


On 5/7/18, 5:57 PM, "IETF Secretariat" <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>; wrote:

 

    

    The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state

    Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Joel Halpern)

    

    The document is available at

    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-proof-of-transit/

    

    Comment:

    As discussed in London, and requested by the document authors, this is a two

    week call for adoption for this document. Reminder: the question is not

    whether this is done, but rather whether this is a good start on work the

    working group would like to advance.

    

    Please speak up.  Silence is NOT consent.

    Given the long list of authors, the chairs particularly need to hear from

    non-authors.

    

    Yours,

    Joel (& Jim)

    

    PS: The issue of there being too many authors will be dealt with separately. 

    That is not an obstacle to adoption, merely an annoyance to the chairs.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email