Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
"Roberta Maglione (robmgl)" <robmgl@cisco.com> Tue, 08 May 2018 16:52 UTC
Return-Path: <robmgl@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8728212EA56; Tue, 8 May 2018 09:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dOYRlguTK1yz; Tue, 8 May 2018 09:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47DCE12EA74; Tue, 8 May 2018 09:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1347; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1525798355; x=1527007955; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=7hHPi4nSMOqVkU+zof1deuiHVs8N8/el/jYvRBFM3bQ=; b=hZDYRgmJq57TB4dqbtRs1dhoqyY9lKLTolJSGulIFACShKSnEYTr7JNz m+ypgjPSRCcwacp3PqmWOQeMAHbTTqBkC/UMDheCiiCZM96yupBpRBTNt 1X7Eqw1s+YA3nAFgRd8JjBPxfodoq9WHJJo2IRORI3EkasnlTdDaBqxhu M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C8CgBq1fFa/4sNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNDYXooCphbgXmBD5MogXgLGAuDSIEBAoJlITYWAQIBAQEBAQECbBwMhSgBAQEBAwEBGx00FwQCAQgRBAEBHwULJwsdCAIEARIIg0aBVg+pVYhDgkMFiCWCE4QagxEBAQMBgTmFdwKYKggChWOIYIE9g2CHTYlGhl8CERMBgSQBIw4jgVJwFTuCQ4JIiEiFPm+QO4EYAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,379,1520899200"; d="scan'208";a="390328758"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2018 16:52:34 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (xch-aln-007.cisco.com [173.36.7.17]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w48GqYF4032364 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 8 May 2018 16:52:34 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-009.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) by XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (173.36.7.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 8 May 2018 11:52:33 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-009.cisco.com ([173.37.102.19]) by XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com ([173.37.102.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 8 May 2018 11:52:33 -0500
From: "Roberta Maglione (robmgl)" <robmgl@cisco.com>
To: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>, "draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org" <draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org>, "sfc-chairs@ietf.org" <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
Thread-Index: AQHT5f7cTDLNLaL7iEKrzA2KhGz4haQmDW0w
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 16:52:33 +0000
Message-ID: <125c9198f5634a3ca37e1fb29893bc77@XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com>
References: <152569607848.1439.13053030504229319467.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <152569607848.1439.13053030504229319467.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.213.236]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/tddjHfXCOBJ2r6HulFX5XNXwYXY>
Subject: Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 16:52:39 -0000
I support the adoption of this draft as WG item. Roberta -----Original Message----- From: sfc <sfc-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of IETF Secretariat Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 2:28 PM To: draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org; sfc-chairs@ietf.org; sfc@ietf.org Subject: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Joel Halpern) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-proof-of-transit/ Comment: As discussed in London, and requested by the document authors, this is a two week call for adoption for this document. Reminder: the question is not whether this is done, but rather whether this is a good start on work the working group would like to advance. Please speak up. Silence is NOT consent. Given the long list of authors, the chairs particularly need to hear from non-authors. Yours, Joel (& Jim) PS: The issue of there being too many authors will be dealt with separately. That is not an obstacle to adoption, merely an annoyance to the chairs. _______________________________________________ sfc mailing list sfc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
- [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof… IETF Secretariat
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Bernier, Daniel
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Reinaldo Penno (repenno)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… John Lemon
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Akshaya Nadahalli
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Diego R. Lopez
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Mickey Spiegel
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Purkayastha, Debashish
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Aviv Kfir
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Srihari Raghavan (srihari)