Re: [sfc] draft-ietf-sfc-oam-packet-00 status & comments (was RE: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh/)
mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Thu, 14 April 2022 14:15 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3387E3A1B31 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 07:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XGDGx5MfMT9v for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 07:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E918E3A1B2F for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 07:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar02.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfedar24.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4KfM1P2B28z5wL1; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:15:21 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1649945721; bh=2Vs8t7f51qhqy7+yCUxLe4RaeTc2p6C67zUm4uoWIk0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=R7te0Y8iCWWBoA3MaUpz3PGCnB8mH9PIQ0z7s7Wt00xVdS//Uj9bKE+Mje38MzdIh Ge92w0JeLsW3/BLm0BpD38dA7N/L4SOXTo126vpCCbVXukOK08qFw/uSdkuIIn5opr XxfM3chBerybzRNla66tFhrxp0Njp7+E69Knv2dgxJc2+ZipPPTGOCplyB3oftYmnV MaB5h3Y0FIC4zbWVU6h8lv9MoYy6ozCBNoisyOtQn4Qc4F5alk9GAjQWc7XaZOLSyo QlQnuQWq8tQRLE3S/GX/AE5GNzoWdD1FKhSBj7nCzKvK5UfhKJYQ0APqsQjpOtG29j c9MCxaYeEUh0w==
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <fbrockne@cisco.com>, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
CC: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-sfc-oam-packet-00 status & comments (was RE: [sfc] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh/)
Thread-Index: AQHYUAdyTfn4mT4Gt0yTQDDltxjcy6zvcKNg
Content-Class:
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:15:20 +0000
Message-ID: <24793_1649945721_62582C79_24793_130_1_4e89cf0b314b41d29d16dd359b825d77@orange.com>
References: <CY4PR11MB16728FC6DB7FAC1A2D4C2F9DDAEF9@CY4PR11MB1672.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <ca15d82e-bdee-b45a-b028-757231c50b4a@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <ca15d82e-bdee-b45a-b028-757231c50b4a@joelhalpern.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SetDate=2022-04-14T14:03:22Z; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Method=Privileged; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Name=unrestricted_parent.2; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SiteId=90c7a20a-f34b-40bf-bc48-b9253b6f5d20; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ActionId=86eedff0-763f-4118-adac-623a5b5d1511; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ContentBits=0
x-originating-ip: [10.115.27.51]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/tpZbBBFWq26fmfqIsYA6g5hfgds>
Subject: Re: [sfc] draft-ietf-sfc-oam-packet-00 status & comments (was RE: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh/)
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:15:29 -0000
Hi Joel, Franck, OK for me. See the full candidate changes at: https://tinyurl.com/oam-packet-latest Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> > Envoyé : jeudi 14 avril 2022 15:56 > À : Frank Brockners (fbrockne) <fbrockne@cisco.com>; BOUCADAIR > Mohamed INNOV/NET <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; Greg Mirsky > <gregimirsky@gmail.com> > Cc : sfc@ietf.org; Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) > <cpignata@cisco.com> > Objet : Re: draft-ietf-sfc-oam-packet-00 status & comments (was > RE: [sfc] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf- > sfc-ioam-nsh/) > > Authors, WG participants? That edit looks acceptable to me? > Frank, assuming we make that change, are you okay with this being > sent to the IESG for publication as an RFC? > > Yours, > Joel > > On 4/14/2022 9:47 AM, Frank Brockners (fbrockne) wrote: > > Hi Joel, > > > > Looking at https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sfc/documents/ - it > does not list draft-ietf-sfc-oam-packet-00 as in last call. The > WGLC statement got me by surprise - I really missed that. > > > > Reading through draft-ietf-sfc-oam-packet-00, the clause that > Med mentioned earlier could be misread, as in "NSH could interfere > with the operation of other protocols". Or in other words, the O- > bit can only be about SFC OAM data, which is what SFC control. > Otherwise we could go wild and argue for adding additional bits > like "D-Bit: Packet contains data from a data base" or "C-Bit: > Packet contains data of the CEO of the company"... > > > > Suggested change: > > > > OLD: > > Such a packet is any NSH-encapsulated packet that > exclusively includes OAM data. > > An OAM data can be included in the Fixed-Length Context > Header, > > optional Context Headers, and/or the inner packet. > > > > NEW: > > Such a packet is any NSH-encapsulated packet that > exclusively includes SFC OAM data. > > SFC OAM data can be included in the Fixed-Length Context > Header, optional Context Headers, and/or the inner packet. > > > > > > Cheers, Frank > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
- [sfc] draft-ietf-sfc-oam-packet-00 status & comme… Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [sfc] draft-ietf-sfc-oam-packet-00 status & c… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] draft-ietf-sfc-oam-packet-00 status & c… Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [sfc] draft-ietf-sfc-oam-packet-00 status & c… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] draft-ietf-sfc-oam-packet-00 status & c… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] draft-ietf-sfc-oam-packet-00 status & c… Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [sfc] draft-ietf-sfc-oam-packet-00 status & c… mohamed.boucadair