IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 18 February 2021 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60BB3A1331 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:05:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LjH3X7uHYyhX for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:05:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2A383A132F for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:05:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id a17so5175063ljq.2 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:05:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Y6nGhik5mThvTUJfCXbtcNrXd7OMQAE8GCUYHiqCbGw=; b=X2LQOAgHOyy2rBO3KMdmSPuSZ7yL/rU3QcdWLkdafo1XYgMDIxN6fiwA9CoJTwlyot fYxD+7JU7RMsEHTNYfiv5X2ikBtJYwv4E+9OUBTOYvh9/xcYaGloPy34x3X+Rrt45REy 2RZQLtNT6k+mh4Azr04Lf7IPE4DynI3+r/XW6P8UE+lmgbfT43exM0EC8ylA5XS5wnnL 9c29+QzW2/VCrxqxEbNZnyOih0StTpHZItOdIxn7jGSpNxpNy2lE6GagHe+R7APRJXZi Z0HhmzHCkAJZStmIsUB5LzS2Nz1RQoYFF+O+4//qmoKA8q9DLaJ4UBza0ejYYHWEp22M L9fw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Y6nGhik5mThvTUJfCXbtcNrXd7OMQAE8GCUYHiqCbGw=; b=dqCXTA8d0NSSe9ix41PLNWMUrWB5iLASFY9uw2qaNpqGVVaOMyPe1OiPi5SAEBUpON TCk8Ay72i1ONm3t0JgnHyciLpOHJ4qvfm7gEV+G5ExMay7IEzoaLQEH5Xf6/K4BYaCeX Kv+1ca09M54BMI/4/tzjVhZITyo4cmwMV8rVuVBFsa/SmoWvP4lqyzMmHmQNFjlvVPkd yNvbvDROeC1D6Keu0n3kybyaBidA6eMYvDCMByX7mheW1VTxPeN5jMvoB00o9leK3qWs 4w7YYfF9FuHiwUo/FWggSrIjntjOX8/mOwYEi/wTXRBPJJIcx/Jb0akXMoHW+Bi6LaUC 73lA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533LXeLTVIoLgmQndpk20Tlniw6/fyQM0QR8Fg1KM8v0ty8Jy/tR Wrd5vvItCnv2A97DbDXWwYC5aJ4E2lu5yzd7/QQL+w/u/u6xZw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUa4IChDQ2OuGY67V5vXIIs37RD3SjQPb5p17d6AzllwiSCCnW9016VFvibH0HmCOOqxuQQhkrxwYkECSdkAg=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5285:: with SMTP id q5mr2809961lfm.109.1613660724352; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:05:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161365771236.8570.11348497959366101106@ietfa.amsl.com> <2b68064f-4dd0-d7db-ae78-2971bc572e93@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <2b68064f-4dd0-d7db-ae78-2971bc572e93@joelhalpern.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:05:13 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmV--OA8C0KAZdQdtONndO2_C3HMKXeVKOEYo=nXoYD5HQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000435cdb05bb9daaab"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/vcDGhVyGczn5og7r4sDjyP8ExZY>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:05:29 -0000

Hi Joel and Jim,
I'll be happy to shepherd this document.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6:25 AM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> The WG Last Call for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity has completed
> successfully as noted below.
>
> We now need a document shepherd.
> It would be good for someone other than the chairs to do this.
> If you are willing, please let us know.  We will pick someone with a few
> days.
>
> Thank you,
> Joel
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity
> Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:15:12 -0800 (PST)
> Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org
> Resent-To: tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com, james.n.guichard@futurewei.com,
> jmh@joelhalpern.com
> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:15:12 -0800
> From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
> To: draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity@ietf.org, sfc-chairs@ietf.org
>
>
> The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity has been changed to "WG
> Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up" from "In WG Last Call" by Joel Halpern:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity/
>
> Comment:
> Thank you.  This document has completed WG Last Call successfully.
> Thanks to the authors for promptly addressing comments raised during
> that last call. We will now pick a document shepherd, and in parallel
> ask for an updated security review.
>
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email