Re: [sfc] RFC 8924 on Service Function Chaining (SFC) Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Framework
Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 10 October 2020 19:14 UTC
Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A8E3A163A for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jkvQCS85k-bZ for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 909B13A16F4 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id g29so10213246pgl.2 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=gnWgdl63hX0vqRNCi285XqqBX16qAGXWQdgJ6m6iDxo=; b=lQANHdMIor0bGTk94+ebQ0gKAXvCRM8vkEFzZnBRQCCPv1HHkvHp5qpm409/fxogCJ iPGzd62FKWfhKaL+7BuB1KkmE/5dW1+2vWi6OhK/xkHiXvEVMVI8pEtI6BfUwyWcNGW3 ivij0PaQ5qpqB4E9QC8N75D+YsrjuoM5JzWZL7hwqzQRlGWgOrK1WacRv6RZdlPyJzTo Dv9jMVpr7K9cq1Y0937AGTzfIRafa3tuZDNAI5BnpNAGCuPNrvV9DmaE+MOHlvukOE8/ paCPyvVWqtNj3UV/RJf0vUTOCI8O7YH3gLTmxLvazFXbR3p3NwuizngJ1H33cZky4ayr Ifww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=gnWgdl63hX0vqRNCi285XqqBX16qAGXWQdgJ6m6iDxo=; b=bZGRtqfkTa3fmvVRiqnAEoLpHk5jYJaJKsCU/6xexFHixRbpio0zls4hWepvWtGHVd ArFrc2CZD1onFZL2J7LI/GdR7kyK8HrkXbdr55TFoCTfdcDggvg8d5wGo2uk+qWzap/D olcNdSHQSHYcsz1BZkEEnwTnxCUVKlJXOGZq4L/rVtPJA+e2etUFGm7wyQ32RRKD4MZX HN2P4PWxFXVimqDeE0/+WpiTifEIYhCQs5gJ17+96IBuuijFCp2eGCQwaopYxgGYzNdA zFqs3HbPKMv/mF0wVUoXbpOsdDdMD0wf2NEQQvdokTUIgaAENCYzI2KnZXLmRs1vTbp/ zyEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+5Oxj75wIJQf+EUWpQj+H0u8ZfnoNo4DWQY0pbcZF/k+jEWqS kAIT5snlRIUDOg3lXKgpRQg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw5jpczc1AoSTU6+oC1X9ae1cO+9lZOeytQeZpyTl703bynxOYirZNveVtRrBYthd3ZDi5NNQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fe82:: with SMTP id co2mr11511048pjb.22.1602357243056; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.18] (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x18sm9687188pga.49.2020.10.10.12.13.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:13:55 -0700
Message-Id: <451EA2BB-CAE5-419C-B3C7-036806E14404@gmail.com>
References: <DM6PR13MB3066D4CCB869223D68404CFED2090@DM6PR13MB3066.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, sfc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR13MB3066D4CCB869223D68404CFED2090@DM6PR13MB3066.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
To: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18A393)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/vw7iLOz1geBIIPEpf3k-N_5flvg>
Subject: Re: [sfc] RFC 8924 on Service Function Chaining (SFC) Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Framework
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 19:14:07 -0000
+1 Regards, Jeff > On Oct 10, 2020, at 04:52, James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com> wrote: > > +1 !! > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sfc <sfc-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern > Sent: Friday, October 09, 2020 11:41 PM > Cc: sfc@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [sfc] RFC 8924 on Service Function Chaining (SFC) Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Framework > > Congratulations and my thanks to the working group on progressing this. > > There is a lot of followup proposed work related to this. It would be good if folks would review and comment if they think it is useful. > > Yours, > Joel > >> On 10/9/2020 7:47 PM, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: >> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. >> >> >> RFC 8924 >> >> Title: Service Function Chaining (SFC) Operations, >> Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Framework >> Author: S. Aldrin, >> C. Pignataro, Ed., >> N. Kumar, Ed., >> R. Krishnan, >> A. Ghanwani >> Status: Informational >> Stream: IETF >> Date: October 2020 >> Mailbox: aldrin.ietf@gmail.com, >> cpignata@cisco.com, >> naikumar@cisco.com, >> ramkri123@gmail.com, >> anoop@alumni.duke.edu >> Pages: 20 >> Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None >> >> I-D Tag: draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-15.txt >> >> URL: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Finfo%2Frfc8924&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cb92d1044148f48078bd708d86cce6071%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637378980948682722%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=bKuZEJw27xjwrsvs3ebi28sACtZ5vEB6X8G1RuQzH%2Bw%3D&reserved=0 >> >> DOI: 10.17487/RFC8924 >> >> This document provides a reference framework for Operations, >> Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) for Service Function Chaining >> (SFC). >> >> This document is a product of the Service Function Chaining Working Group of the IETF. >> >> >> INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. >> It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of >> this memo is unlimited. >> >> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. >> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fietf-announce&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cb92d1044148f48078bd708d86cce6071%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637378980948682722%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=pTWR9TUkTgHcphmPawjYQUKJ%2B86uxTzksAc4%2BApE1%2Bk%3D&reserved=0 >> >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail >> man.rfc-editor.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frfc-dist&data=04%7C01%7C >> james.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cb92d1044148f48078bd708d86cce6071%7C >> 0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637378980948682722%7CUnknow >> n%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLC >> JXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=C4i8NOB%2B%2Bs9hVKfMAAqa0Z39BloTpxPn1bkS >> swRSwAI%3D&reserved=0 >> >> For searching the RFC series, see >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww. >> rfc-editor.org%2Fsearch&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewe >> i.com%7Cb92d1044148f48078bd708d86cce6071%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d559 >> 1fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637378980948682722%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4 >> wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sda >> ta=%2B8hgWl0KmmdqupKj%2FPcbWMdixLbe5c0jC8DG9X%2FAqQs%3D&reserved=0 >> For downloading RFCs, see >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww. >> rfc-editor.org%2Fretrieve%2Fbulk&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%4 >> 0futurewei.com%7Cb92d1044148f48078bd708d86cce6071%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c >> 753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637378980948682722%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8ey >> JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C100 >> 0&sdata=FfqyU3nnWhPMZWh67F5P0%2FHQXFE8xr3wb917mYUgt6k%3D&reser >> ved=0 >> >> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the >> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. >> Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are >> for unlimited distribution. >> >> >> The RFC Editor Team >> Association Management Solutions, LLC >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sfc mailing list >> sfc@ietf.org >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww. >> ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsfc&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichar >> d%40futurewei.com%7Cb92d1044148f48078bd708d86cce6071%7C0fee8ff2a3b2401 >> 89c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637378980948682722%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d >> 8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C >> 1000&sdata=2K3vnfEhNA%2F9HPVjsaQfktY959hJBPGdLXosjkxKeAk%3D&re >> served=0 >> > > _______________________________________________ > sfc mailing list > sfc@ietf.org > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsfc&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Cb92d1044148f48078bd708d86cce6071%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637378980948682722%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=2K3vnfEhNA%2F9HPVjsaQfktY959hJBPGdLXosjkxKeAk%3D&reserved=0 > > _______________________________________________ > sfc mailing list > sfc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
- [sfc] RFC 8924 on Service Function Chaining (SFC)… rfc-editor
- Re: [sfc] RFC 8924 on Service Function Chaining (… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] RFC 8924 on Service Function Chaining (… James Guichard
- Re: [sfc] RFC 8924 on Service Function Chaining (… Jeff Tantsura