IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06

James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com> Fri, 12 July 2019 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB5112082C for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 11:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=futurewei.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mE6HZ1Hrx-PR for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 11:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM05-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr710102.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.71.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8AAA120820 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 11:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=TJ0bhW+DOFEsKkEoX+Chj/9c9jrra+iLoDSQeR3j/DdojvWH302rt1np65XF+UsLahsgWRl9xeI5CaTFXliG+M66hlJNPChit9JB/ZzPsNhTxd/0VLvIygyR+o+4VaxUapeDu96c1UD1YeFbMUWXeDHNR3QokoHSQaTFDpw6WE+o3uZjV5xukSp01QSFZZRLhHQo68huDz/D7kWd+EYBvhFZSiDqKQ7x3F8uuy2731XJNuo+sMSF0hF2y4CSlGpNKaTaAbfN5MZ8CeDTJjuX4fDSS+NLMEkOfJdW/P6OcV9BnAu8WK7in7+471BuFJ19CsRkPyweTB8VAnR7RPJPIw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=esD4zTIY1VQTsRj4/h2YggZtbAqizACt8aVdVAE+tvU=; b=kUIpkocaePv9D6eHu7ebvm+IMlHOD/Pu1f7JrK2EGx2C0JXvtZHCw9uB0VeNXWDeoXLFZMFFncToK1n6C0RQG3u1iFJcttJu4XyiqMLWc/52EsLL/za0lJhzHWurBtEObdLp07Z+tJQUvQbBdyoDaTtFFU1otknl7LNRuknI/95Hv1H/Gxq+6lpkjKm56RFa48xUJdVRtE+HxK7vyXd4K1lJIQalPU5az+xCjI/kyj5TPhnod/6RVoG7mmNF7I8N0kk330g1SGUsrUblk6p/H5jzRop/ja4iH72toEEO3Hs+Xxkn69tBQBsybvgeIMB3TNlv7f3MJOPEkXfRXYmB+Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1;spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=futurewei.com;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=futurewei.com;dkim=pass header.d=futurewei.com;arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Futurewei.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=esD4zTIY1VQTsRj4/h2YggZtbAqizACt8aVdVAE+tvU=; b=ilQKhlcA81ZaRMrDIUY/s2vZ7+bI0h28r2/leI+k54WBA/ZcyW+Y4GOcKYwvRxk1LtkbTZoAP9A5ZhBQXE7UztilzF5RMsMWSwRqlGTfrKYh7fj0HqqMdAmXTmuCRVyh5VI4ZK6BWljrY1r8NibcScoYjXYwH6zhfb+cgg1ioWs=
Received: from CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (52.132.246.219) by CH2PR13MB3654.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (20.180.13.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2094.7; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:28:18 +0000
Received: from CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::242e:bba8:3a1d:6e42]) by CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::242e:bba8:3a1d:6e42%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2073.004; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:28:18 +0000
From: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
CC: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06
Thread-Index: AQHVFWHG6SZyvEyD3EGGLNC6v36bBKbEtDQAgALfKIA=
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:28:18 +0000
Message-ID: <CH2PR13MB3608EBF57B7627218FB6325DD2F20@CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BYAPR13MB25978FD458B59EB22067685FD21E0@BYAPR13MB2597.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CA+RyBmWEbrk5rY8XpvTKVAqOzcdWAGDzVn1p=Fjgzfg8yOTMGA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmWEbrk5rY8XpvTKVAqOzcdWAGDzVn1p=Fjgzfg8yOTMGA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=james.n.guichard@futurewei.com;
x-originating-ip: [47.14.28.158]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3b34d155-f331-4d5c-3a85-08d706f6b633
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:CH2PR13MB3654;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CH2PR13MB3654:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 4
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CH2PR13MB36540CD27B0513F32D505219D2F20@CH2PR13MB3654.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7219;
x-forefront-prvs: 00963989E5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(366004)(136003)(39850400004)(376002)(396003)(346002)(189003)(199004)(66946007)(76116006)(33656002)(6116002)(790700001)(517774005)(3846002)(606006)(229853002)(6506007)(53546011)(81166006)(71200400001)(71190400001)(102836004)(8676002)(966005)(1411001)(76176011)(5070765005)(52536014)(66446008)(64756008)(66476007)(8936002)(66556008)(66066001)(7696005)(86362001)(486006)(6916009)(81156014)(53936002)(99286004)(478600001)(14454004)(7736002)(256004)(74316002)(54896002)(68736007)(316002)(26005)(6436002)(476003)(6306002)(25786009)(446003)(2906002)(11346002)(9686003)(55016002)(186003)(6246003)(4326008)(236005)(5660300002)(9326002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CH2PR13MB3654; H:CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: futurewei.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: mXgVVqNrAvvPmDNjlXcxXOZOPZrI/iIo6jRX3a9u6BDPdmuIlR+pXQlx6II5FXC3zgN7gjC+sHw3AcWR+eVBhD2H+rTygqU+OFxgcNflCqJOQM561afbhgDA64Z3PwptketwMk4kqMgAgPcxhmnx3drwg/45CtictPBx8VV3hW3HQPACXPnmuaKuCJZ4RXdcljuwMm67XvPOCYd8idVms2hTl8fOIe9JllQwDaY/YymtM46blYhp0FaMMha/lo6jRFpUWSxh5cSU2TINXz5qQZG7fcQfWAsewRJOTyms3h4caw047cIGdIpsuStt1DgVCOKMuQe+oHyp2TqERCuaFKUJnI+FxHeZL1Hjx2DLpYdAEPqr1aJdnrUvuW0Irdyv8gU07uSL6Zx3am5eSeQTcMrmoF85eFefOowrAo9ZEW8=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CH2PR13MB3608EBF57B7627218FB6325DD2F20CH2PR13MB3608namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Futurewei.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3b34d155-f331-4d5c-3a85-08d706f6b633
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Jul 2019 18:28:18.3387 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 0fee8ff2-a3b2-4018-9c75-3a1d5591fedc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: jguichar@futurewei.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CH2PR13MB3654
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/7kFFkJlbu58me99Z9J_nuJfDFXM>
Subject: Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:28:24 -0000

Hi Greg,

That is correct; OAM work within the SFC WG is to support the encapsulation developed by the WG which is NSH.

Regards,

Jim & Joel


From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 6:33 PM
To: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
Cc: sfc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06

Hi Jim, Joel, et al.,
I have a question about the scope of the SFC OAM Framework. In Section 1.1 the scope is defined as:
   The focus of this document is to provide an architectural framework
   for SFC OAM, particularly focused on the aspect of the Operations
   component within OAM.  Actual solutions and mechanisms are outside
   the scope of this document.
But after reading it several times over, I believe that the scope of the document is more narrow and includes only OAM for SFC NSH. I couldn't find any discussion of OAM for SFC based on RFC 8595, nor I could find it being referenced in the framework. If it is outside the scope of this document, should it provide an explanation, identify it as an outstanding work for the future?

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 7:37 AM James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com<mailto:james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>> wrote:

Dear WG:



This message starts a new two week WG Last Call on advancing https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework/<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C47025cacedc4489298f308d70586a75d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C636983948205639558&sdata=rMbJ1lHWZ7ebYZZRYxlHqNwFyMx18Q%2FymDelgVTx8So%3D&reserved=0> for publication as an Informational RFC.



Substantive comments and statements of support for publishing this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.  This last call will end on 11th June 2019.



Thanks!



Jim & Joel





_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsfc&data=02%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C47025cacedc4489298f308d70586a75d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C636983948205639558&sdata=1Gd6%2BpgfSvWdBTv8THeXlpuM1PZL85YHFv67AA0dTSQ%3D&reserved=0>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email