IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sframe] Intended DISPATCH outcome / charter

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Wed, 22 July 2020 13:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3D03A08B6 for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 06:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QYLfBy9qz9HG for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 06:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE33F3A087F for <sframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 06:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id e7so1870834qti.1 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 06:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pPYFWEJGfpcZ87OYHZltGZC24Y8oXSZW/rFpDiv9XXY=; b=QOPZ4yujqg+SagW/qY9hANgB+78iYwUIkCB3V1cFUKWyrosuTILIQhU9SG0A+YIDaH 9UEzo25aTZ5s8VACV5SCIN3KesLVmZa63O+xvkX2RwTxY+QLl2yC/+NuWgh+RBtUlRx5 5zhkzO+DgsttFr6SoZXM0GhgteZU1CGN7MxhF64CyzVHU6bBQW+InLz0OewVaPJOOaqS 3KdpmmhPB9vEDOlkq3US4a5lyglKONhrnOSuzzStlOctDmtC1aicIPdADBt4nbXyX80n jYCDiorC92fI7XMoQ7VVuiBXIm24R2FIKhDAgEiZdxOLicibRBPK155FvYU8jKUca1q8 SyRw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pPYFWEJGfpcZ87OYHZltGZC24Y8oXSZW/rFpDiv9XXY=; b=fx80mpv0+4yHqcSVNf7GlXh8jkOoNjid6/ytPwq+KUBOCvdnhJdydAKTMGeOC3slw0 oIENxQShvuaeo9zVeElH9XsccIPQdu1PI/P/J91nJ/Bb12PbSktcNmELzpV7ESpQNhoD ZaNtCfM225ulvSBQ7wTqYYiGY6AjMDb+qkFSfOOPPXJcZyFbx1ZzY0F/c/tBl7S6wNIy wlo16VWwHu0e1K7tfwfFWISCwpuYL/dAnTDyBH3hUnVOOBvNvhe6Ww3rYIP1ae8lwpdR yCs7hm2wClOahAIJ7ygGclplj7dXn0ycTy1qmadRRzXmufKt+EFl/ItKSzE5xWzbwtV5 c5AA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531SrwkX+KrAP/aN8eMFMbsyuEKPn1CEUTNYW8kDj4nXbu11+AcC J02PQf0h/1nws7RaU9ZIVpnX//+SftQDKrO5oyny7FMUbCQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmj7oeZXEIka/vhXtbVVtspf8jNUsyM4vz7Y1oXbPGjxpfet7wgfXWexTmzdS8MYzxOzZYgOM6nk6Z0lqQBj4=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:387b:: with SMTP id r56mr5567834qtb.353.1595426137713; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 06:55:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL02cgTNad12T8a0V9E5ca6Y7tJYK6-=_c4j1LLiaCM9-DF-=g@mail.gmail.com> <CACtMSQXwuVh61uXQeqoNcAwWJsED13rDqe290_1rw39H_r75Rg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACtMSQXwuVh61uXQeqoNcAwWJsED13rDqe290_1rw39H_r75Rg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:55:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgTqV9auh2XgEgmgQ2cA3tPrhTKT2kj4rh-Rw2hZdt+y3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre GOUAILLARD <Alex.GOUAILLARD@cosmosoftware.io>
Cc: sframe@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000034403205ab081878"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/-b2Z3MbRuHhl_KZKlzVyCdB227g>
Subject: Re: [Sframe] Intended DISPATCH outcome / charter
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:55:41 -0000

I would rate March 2021 as aggressive, but potentially achievable.  On the
one hand, deadlines for IETF WGs are not really enforced.  On the other
hand, since folks are already shipping code, this seemed like work that
could move a bit more quickly than average.

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 7:52 PM Alexandre GOUAILLARD <
Alex.GOUAILLARD@cosmosoftware.io> wrote:

> Thanks richard for doing this.
> This looks interesting.
> A naive question, is the march 2021 deadline not too tight? for example if
> we decide to add a document for the video conference use case to show how
> MLS could be used, will it extend the deadline, have its own deadline (per
> document) or have to fit into the march 2021 deadline?
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:46 AM Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I see that SFrame is on the DISPATCH agenda.  Great idea, thanks to
>> whomever arranged that.
>>
>> In my experience, DISPATCH proposals have gone more smoothly when they've
>> had a proposed resolution in mind.  Recall that the DISPATCH outcomes are
>> roughly:
>>
>> 0. Do nothing
>> 1. Existing working group
>> 2. AD sponsorship
>> 3. New WG
>>
>> My inclination is that this work is probably about the right size for its
>> own small, focused working group.  Toward that goal, I've gone ahead and
>> sketched a charter for the WG here:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google..com/document/d/10rG8nAR0U6cBBPffzXnLaPPYL4uzxYViAvgiSezoa7o/edit?usp=sharing
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/10rG8nAR0U6cBBPffzXnLaPPYL4uzxYViAvgiSezoa7o/edit?usp=sharing>
>>
>> I think that captures everything I think is important to get done here.
>> But please feel free to comment there (or here) if you think the scope is
>> wrong.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --Richard
>> --
>> Sframe mailing list
>> Sframe@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email