Re: [Sframe] Intended DISPATCH outcome / charter

Thanks richard for doing this.
This looks interesting.
A naive question, is the march 2021 deadline not too tight? for example if
we decide to add a document for the video conference use case to show how
MLS could be used, will it extend the deadline, have its own deadline (per
document) or have to fit into the march 2021 deadline?

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:46 AM Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> I see that SFrame is on the DISPATCH agenda.  Great idea, thanks to
> whomever arranged that.
>
> In my experience, DISPATCH proposals have gone more smoothly when they've
> had a proposed resolution in mind.  Recall that the DISPATCH outcomes are
> roughly:
>
> 0. Do nothing
> 1. Existing working group
> 2. AD sponsorship
> 3. New WG
>
> My inclination is that this work is probably about the right size for its
> own small, focused working group.  Toward that goal, I've gone ahead and
> sketched a charter for the WG here:
>
>
> https://docs.google..com/document/d/10rG8nAR0U6cBBPffzXnLaPPYL4uzxYViAvgiSezoa7o/edit?usp=sharing
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/10rG8nAR0U6cBBPffzXnLaPPYL4uzxYViAvgiSezoa7o/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> I think that captures everything I think is important to get done here.
> But please feel free to comment there (or here) if you think the scope is
> wrong.
>
> Cheers,
> --Richard
> --
> Sframe mailing list
> Sframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe
>