[Sframe] Barry Leiba's No Objection on charter-ietf-sframe-00-02: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 28 October 2020 14:43 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: sframe-chairs@ietf.org, sframe@ietf.org, dispatch@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <160389619554.26154.17310005023276866720@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:43:15 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/8YY2Y6HxnmGgEHP3RR-ijNcwVQA>
Subject: [Sframe] Barry Leiba's No Objection on charter-ietf-sframe-00-02: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-sframe-00-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-sframe/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I wonder whether this should be chartered in the Sec Area with an ART AD
(Murray) set as responsible AD.

I also think the last bit:

     Input to the WG
     Proposals already existing relating to this charter proposal:
     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-omara-sframe-00

...shouldn't be in the final charter text (it was fine to have it there during
review).  The draft is referenced in the milestone, and that should cover it.

[Sframe] Barry Leiba's No Objection on charter-ie… Barry Leiba via Datatracker