[Sframe] SFrame agenda for 110

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Thu, 25 February 2021 03:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356BD3A0E27 for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:30:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=jrjRIQeT; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Gvv0oqCQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qhsrhiWC8a_n for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:30:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 420E63A0E1F for <sframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:30:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09635C008D for <sframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:30:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:30:45 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s= fm1; bh=BdYSgQJBJbQgQ5JndVUhsOh9nAso/OZjkfLuu8Jc1GA=; b=jrjRIQeT 5xMjg7XH2LLYh1ow2mi+EQ+82OqK3UGCiu/N2O7bVxy0Mv1l/GLj8xgk6DkF5fvr sdbxhkgQjpzKilYl9GC08xHNBVZM9F2Ychl2wya/6F5CaaRfAoivLZupg0/UPlRA Rch2n4qbTM1vbTiLd/deXSP1GqaahHZUZYVHjcu/BQ9Mq/WKxRIXf/2sV4xYMm5+ AWwjMlKZrvwushYSe9dTeQlR+uPBJaEyhZ1H/4dV4mMfExFArIcE6sAEMzOg5pE1 hpWvii8qYLRuY3ARGyYIEOjhjlEYgIxbLWI/elw667hHZfA1fBqEhR61eyf1b3tq aojK4sGLuA1lpg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=BdYSgQJBJbQgQ5JndVUhsOh9nAso/ OZjkfLuu8Jc1GA=; b=Gvv0oqCQzon4N3pONDZYRzy2y3knec7HDGWDt2fKAM/nd FJK7Ogyyp+tISWg7OZU4UPDhia4cGsEwIXAC2NOzXVKiT0rItkR/RmwtN6eBlGab kfreN4kXo8UWJZrNTtCb0KokczEymLxPYT5L9/RTFpRBzOaVnDhi+GwrujP4ndq1 9SYpldt1Rt/h1F/zPaTpTkMPKv1Ob8Zd5a1Y8FblzZxTr3SblqFxkl/CurUjsjP+ Yol8kcX85VceTb1jOni7uN/+xYvQ3GzykzxMwbOde+0EfJrqQ9gVOdwyJzs0np3U JzcnxO0kP5XkHrL19zWZt63HG19cduyIVyR11PnsQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:5Rk3YJv6WtARW6El8N_sreMeQarLvIothdrK_kpav25NyqqkUiX8ww> <xme:5Rk3YCcSvixz1tWJdgGz-vvl7jErrFl5H4ugp2bRN764q-P1bvAC7QzQi5a-ukAE5 P1a3VwS5QvVsXT0EzE>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrkeekgdehlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkfffhvffutgesthdtredtre ertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghn thhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvefguddtgfejfeduueehkeehke duueegheefgeevkeekgeelveevffeuudffheehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptden ucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:5Rk3YMwckVYfUMP1dQFrcRXeNjhUMPeo9WFOqIN0ijGumEPgsk0wKQ> <xmx:5Rk3YAP3m_Sr_RQnjZSBIiwrgRJYakSnLHwlqWvyeGkyvXtIU2qVRw> <xmx:5Rk3YJ-iXNOn4nucdIKR5YZf4PQjPrf02UIAykFMdcypkl-fsHwQVA> <xmx:5Rk3YML9F2fJ9J6K8HYH_0bPD2Zzl1eybjnCz8dXFbW1aXhiLOSd7w>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1EA4F4E0137; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:30:45 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-141-gf094924a34-fm-20210210.001-gf094924a
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <27a24a63-b3bd-42dd-823d-7b3143fb8a3b@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:30:24 +1100
From: "Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: sframe@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/OGY6ZNc5X7oVu9yC_DW18pB_M1k>
Subject: [Sframe] SFrame agenda for 110
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 03:30:49 -0000

It has been a little quiet here lately, but I understand that there are still people working.  The chairs would like your help with making the meeting at IETF 110 successful.

We have a 1 hour at 1530 (UTC+1) on Tuesday (2021-03-02).

The issue that seems most pressing is how the framework interacts with packetization and the way in which we decide what is and isn't protected.  It seems like we have made some progress in that area, but at the last meeting some people were not sufficiently happy with the current state of the documentation.

The chairs would like to spend our meeting time discussing this issue with the goal of resolving on a general strategy that can be documented in a framework document.

If you think that you can help us reach a resolution on this issue, we're seeking volunteers to lead the discussion.  It need not be a single person.

If there are other issues you would like discussed during the meeting, reply to this message with a request.  We will discuss what time we can make available.

For the chairs,
Martin