Re: [Sframe] [dispatch] Magnus Westerlund's Block on charter-ietf-sframe-00-00: (with BLOCK and COMMENT)

[Magnus Westerlund <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 15:30 -0700, Emad Omara wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
> 
> Jumping late to this thread, just want to summarize the discussion and
> proposed changes to make sure we are all on the same page.
> 
> AVTCORE is the place to address any WebRTC changes (ie payload type, frame
> metadata ,packetization, etc)

I wouldn't necessary say that all type of WebRTC changes are in scope for
AVTCORE. I was primarily thinking about the RTP payload format and potentially a
new meta data header extension for the switching decision for RTP packets with
SFRAMEs in them. 

> SFrame charter needs to be changed to explicitly mention #1
Yes that would be good. 

> SFrame doc needs to describe the integration point and changes with WebRTC in
> high level language as a guidance for the ATCORE work (I suggest doing so in a
> separate draft)

Yes, I think this is more a high level use-case / architectural informational
document so that the one can ensure that the technical solution do support known
and desired uses cases of SFRAME.

> Would these address your concerns so we can move forward? Please let me know
> if there is anything else I missed.

Yes, I belief so. 

 
Cheers

Magnus Westerlund 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Networks, Ericsson Research
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Mobile [phone]
Torshamnsgatan 23           |
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [e-mail]
----------------------------------------------------------------------