Re: [Sframe] SFrame Draft - IETF 109 Follow Up

Bobo <the.bobo@gmail.com> Mon, 08 February 2021 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <the.bobo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2082A3A138B for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 09:12:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iNgpblUutJ_E for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 09:12:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22e.google.com (mail-oi1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 645A43A10F6 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 09:12:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id r75so2740666oie.11 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 09:12:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4UATMWJZNu/fYqY3Eibp/MqVNzcSIiiqwa1aHylNke4=; b=I4AL4/P+9JZICNvH4kOIkkIvOptpP7JhgjUdclHTqc7Uak9gSQOfDJI1//GQaUfbsJ LIoCSaIUPlEmVBm5eluyPkjDS8/W8DOAmBm4i5CiOKPrizS2lBWtBzDYdzBve0/0szIE 4+Pu5BmJmUvbXsSdF9vSBhu9CXKLEfI8Mh2GzFo6Og07rNkU1X57mtnhVMn8J4B/TiBl BSTOMDo7FH5w8Ml8NRYBad78XfbVG0KoUfIjFYgt82Kyd26c1XYsPopzH/shFtJgwS5k Sa5gG0jkGq/ug3dIdi0npfLtz7PZdUGsdM02HWslzDfz2anPRs1pab/Fc33Z4Ykj0vjw Ky/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4UATMWJZNu/fYqY3Eibp/MqVNzcSIiiqwa1aHylNke4=; b=WSl5B3EBHixRP5gUkTPbrzU1rQTKEgMkIlDDNXNsuhGn+Q5dbeWqkjCZwuo9urUnIk Ps3pmVHKYX15/J9hfeAkDNctyhWkYZJprTrBDBVOEopQFT5+LJXCcfY2eCtYQqTKEMNE lzNSldYqu0mtcVgkBn3RIEESUX1KBFdxUh2aUNG98yLD599KfFNtez9lqHP2nFiXqoJv doQ/gQOLixBeh4xWrz6xf7WRkk/8cmZ+LlMtgZDkwftRBrXQoR2pq96UjZlQouf7r1YI gwyCYKiwVaRmdZRhE4B83c4s6ss0CBUha4hHnco0pT67ELlV8bdJc4lGpTAYrcFjZAD0 dCbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Wsn2dQHoxcLR5qZczHlc9LIwxX+M57JuOnC9j+UMUCTXT6MUX Udg0Dr4Ti4MV1kK/DwltOvS0sdeip+SDiqlr5gc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4belZxDYl1LOvek3hU7gt16FHNGZmuru7FZn9dPGU4C/eH8GJvfeEG9mSdy0U0XfWGkjcol9pCnBkQrA/Ivo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:65a:: with SMTP id z26mr7080741oih.87.1612804360404; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 09:12:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM920XQ_j09N6_fkNa7d5dwu7XTijAa+ibGbb11-03wMOdjKUg@mail.gmail.com> <CANRTqcNmJgoGXBF+4EGs-rFNx60qLijCzjYyRsgMhkwXbcy_TQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANRTqcNmJgoGXBF+4EGs-rFNx60qLijCzjYyRsgMhkwXbcy_TQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bobo <the.bobo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 08:25:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM920XRyGL9F4XTEyEvB-Tgz_THiDBwVvJ38Lbm8jJfO7p0KQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sergio murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@cosmosoftware.io>
Cc: sframe@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fe814205bad6464a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/U5h8F3ycYUSLe7zht5BzIJiQd08>
Subject: Re: [Sframe] SFrame Draft - IETF 109 Follow Up
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:12:43 -0000

Thanks for the update, Sergio!

Gently reminding others to please chime in with any additional concerns and
suggestions for improvement to the draft.

Thanks,
Bobo


On Tue, Jan 12, 2021, 3:01 AM Sergio murillo <
sergio.garcia.murillo@cosmosoftware.io> wrote:

> Hi Bobo,
>
> Regarding the generic packetization and IDU support, the work has already
> started on the AVTCore group and Youenn and I have already started to
> prepare the initial draft of the generic packetization format.
>
> Best regards
> Sergio
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:06 PM Bobo <the.bobo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> The Chairs have reviewed the discussion of draft-omara-sframe at IETF
>> 109.  While there was some support for adoption, it seems like there are
>> enough people with reservations that we aren't comfortable saying that
>> there is consensus to adopt yet.
>>
>> In the interests of making progress, we'd like to ask those with concerns
>> to let us know what those concerns are.  Some explanation of how you think
>> those concerns might best be addressed would be appreciated.
>>
>> Much of what we heard seemed to be around the generic packetization/IDU
>> implementation, and on fixing or removing the header authentication scheme.
>>
>> Our goal here is to have the next revision of the draft address those
>> concerns.  We hope to raise the question of adoption at that point.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bobo (for the Chairs)
>> --
>> Sframe mailing list
>> Sframe@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe
>>
>