[Sframe] Adopting draft-omara-sframe-03

Bobo <the.bobo@gmail.com> Mon, 08 November 2021 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <the.bobo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B173A0788 for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 10:57:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ns41sImbmZ5E for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 10:57:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEE063A0C8A for <sframe@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 10:57:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id c8so49765594ede.13 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 10:57:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/3U/hfxhnk1oXIwzqWSpQJe3QmcdQbTIC23auOhtQqU=; b=IKbbv9yntGNXaC5cdGYQklBcsAs/REsOOy7TVeWVUtZ0062rwClDL3tbMYvD1mNWig etyRdZEYOeUV4z6k6Gxpqyqeedi6r3OiKX6fc0rYloh8vn9WwPFHFxRUX6+rfag4CTmT 7paHqcG2l+3+FLn/HRE9XdPw+sfXpB309agbpBBAthivFFsdVJ80ZHLnvbOa01agH/Dc CMw1NIA5lcrv5m+JDVA0K0GcuTqs50C3c7KUn+sogQ2Q+PUTtxktdGKOUHE06CnSfS+b JVtjo1P6QNa2J7NQogmAwBhZQH79uaKBzF+NjtRuebfpN4RYuwhUk5f28AZOmTgQ7Cal LnPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/3U/hfxhnk1oXIwzqWSpQJe3QmcdQbTIC23auOhtQqU=; b=DRKH8OyL5bcWdF/7eBT+5YdfuiX7NczAUqqc/Bn+SvCIVs1ZKITc9WmYdIdDk2ucVL kpl1YprtyCK7YPDsWXPeTinbp9ISt0B0gVaII6Nx6O1eVyOFmxFjZegHQ9ap0D+lasc2 Nde1tSsT7DZB8OetcnlKCYwkVLTw87PhtGXVo2rCq1ITEClr/cZj53Zw1/sHF6aQnkMc OPqvo68Xbdpe0O5c0TfhtJjhPsykRuDXoaDlaviLkpTEJB6rtFttl0+QtB96+e9ef3Pp OdQJhlV3dQ1vWMvNGwWNwraue8p6MNLiewRR7VMcny2mgZyGkU6ag3TXmTNf5DK/zyjE kbaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532SzscOAQot+pyTCU08J2OTtUGQ4bLvkXng8vrOjS5bA7T8vf+H xbTXoETE4H0yuhz27tohcGXbxS3cw+26nOVx0ofk2q6+
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQZtpO3fwazYStfj7Y+FsNV241IrbzQuuR9T+ATcYuNB7YXMHcjM0zIZCuN3pBYlu3pKGY9mGIyDSC7Lp3UCI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:961e:: with SMTP id gb30mr1780598ejc.436.1636397823876; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 10:57:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Bobo <the.bobo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 10:56:50 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM920XTZN0YvdgiZRSycBRMZs8Oa4ZG8KiM8D=bEOZRbKAF+jA@mail.gmail.com>
To: sframe@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000000e3b505d04b8f3e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/VRkOls6quOmWhXIVyKP4zTr82Kk>
Subject: [Sframe] Adopting draft-omara-sframe-03
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Media Frames <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 18:57:20 -0000

Hey Everyone,

Thanks for your constructive feedback on adopting the latest SFrame draft,
draft-omara-sframe-03 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omara-sframe/
).

After reviewing the comments we think the appropriate next step is to adopt
draft-omara-sframe-03 as an item for our working group.

Adopting paves the way for the editors taking a first step at tackling the
feedback raised.

In particular, we note the following open issues for future work:

1. Agnostic approach to SFrame vs. SPacket - each has pros/cons

2. Splitting out E2EE / key management material into an appendix as stage
setting

3. Articulate goals, threat model, and use cases more clearly (likely will
be aided by refactoring non-SFrame/SPacket materials into appendix)

Please see specific prior emails, e.g. from Bernard and Eric, for detailed
feedback and discussion.

Thanks,
Bobo (for the Chairs)