Re: [Sframe] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-ietf-sframe-00-00: (with COMMENT)

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Thu, 10 September 2020 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BFE3A0A39 for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ib--lvbQ4QXt for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x732.google.com (mail-qk1-x732.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::732]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEAB83A0A2D for <sframe@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x732.google.com with SMTP id w186so6079754qkd.1 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IB7xXDM8hr63Q7z545YYfBbwqCjjqHfXpul4Pw+UtdQ=; b=fsb89ZGa7/MEsC2f1QhD0Bwj0iMTX2WFaajFs03XJGjC+n1sAXZP5Yy5OlXqPZjPw1 nJXwoKSqHGvbAHki6X6VHP94QO5zrL8gUPvG8oitDrYFYRuq4AP4BrxC0ujMNtOpUmZm 4gb9yHIgRdHHlKB10Ot/Saam8ChMfoo1d3HPfZXIBSrTJIDWNMUdAbjClXRH63N1uRVc qMKMgXVrhlDenPcIcv/cBtqC5Owv5DEbQsplML+ZMVxq+FZIDF04KHnrk+LtpFBUh5pZ M4PqQEpOKRznDJBlrNcLeF1icbvj2isCPKVixOnaNgdZtWEpM+onLL3Vd6mnlXz0itj6 Q9KA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IB7xXDM8hr63Q7z545YYfBbwqCjjqHfXpul4Pw+UtdQ=; b=USzjjcWlGBLANdjI318efdP38Yzuv23xo7dUf3Y+uOUwebAh2IJbZORaTJSJi01uBt gw1RlXzxQG1Y39AMhomOOTjLNXs+JnQvSDlN4cN6il6WY5O/AhPrOLJfUcO4p1Hnel0C 3w6qBrlatwfRF2mOzo7BPouTYXJWma4L2YR/KVAd7GJuaSLIu07/ztPn5N32dddFPNDP +Hpt4jqCy6TyzovOmiaw55HVcfHiNjT84a8+LQS81PM2/UCbimh5SMXsc0flar7eSbJ7 wwqORx44qlnandRy9C1m/gZUOfvbhNqmn0M6rAIV8NnaF7apMp7baKJDOZQufokvbDg9 BTBg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532lIOjkETLbNwYoeVF4ka7OjLOxKa5uMGcUL7ugikuvRX0mB2SL TKhNnFys8ncoDmIkVNB7LRHCHuNIL6aIinATRcaibA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzoaPCXkW1bKJJqWQzFn887Bg76AxqtQz07ktxAKm4Wvy9gNxnGZ1wZDPsTaM7bEepDB6+bveBqLT8BCrRS14Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1597:: with SMTP id d23mr7852975qkk.347.1599745431960; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159968409648.6670.955964550557674225@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159968409648.6670.955964550557674225@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:43:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgTBuY8CnHSy=opJdFPcAWNKY1f2XpTNAr-A6==NJgzWgA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sframe-chairs@ietf.org, DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>, sframe@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003413f305aef5c253"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/X8XweQYqay9NHBf7fSc9UWXhJFM>
Subject: Re: [Sframe] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-ietf-sframe-00-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:43:54 -0000

Hi Roman,

The encapsulation provides exactly one service, authenticated encryption.
(Symmetric encryption, if that needs clarifying.)  So there's no question
of configuring security services.  I'll tighten things up to be clearer
about this.

--Richard


On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 4:41 PM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-sframe-00-00: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-sframe/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ** I share Éric Vyncke concerns with the bulleted list of what SFRAME
> encapsulation will provide.  My recommendation would be to reframe this
> text
> around what security properties/assurances/services this encapsulation will
> provide (rather than a functional list).
>
> ** If configuring the security services is out of scope, where is it
> anticipated that this signalling protocol work would occur?
>
>
>
> --
> Sframe mailing list
> Sframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe
>