[Sframe] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-sframe-00-00: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 10 September 2020 11:48 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietf.org
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AA13A092E; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 04:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: sframe-chairs@ietf.org, sframe@ietf.org, dispatch@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.16.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <159973851434.24711.6050855169807417727@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 04:48:34 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/hG2EMOe3yG6munKJbRSTJNLiKEY>
Subject: [Sframe] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-sframe-00-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:48:35 -0000

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-sframe-00-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-sframe/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This may come up in the context of the document reviews, but given the recent
discussions on terminology we may want to proactively avoid use of the term
'nonce' in the WG charter.