Re: [Sframe] [dispatch] Request session at IETF 108 dispatch

Patrick McManus <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com> Mon, 15 June 2020 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573F13A092D; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 11:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vvzgY635vSd6; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 11:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5EF33A0926; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 11:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id g5so13916074otg.6; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 11:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=i2v/d08OHEPd+AR18JS6apn9EPHprIGOZ2OIam59E4w=; b=RFeD8OIyYI+uTxxvJH8Dub5x2SU6fLGGYNcge4o/it6ytdE9yDvgs9+pRaHDl4S6DM R0n8PegyNi/orPbl4krgee0IMgCk3HP1/LjHG57ZahLikzIdALC9tvRwrZngj1fgOvGp EQ3D7lfVuoW5AjvMDQ13n+8nf2kw+Fc/odw25PS49GogqQRSKOYFLWpbiP0oehMK8Qvu n1JcQMbv8VXhI9ZsPt+PPR+5ei3eSPjwBcsABiypRZqo/3U+aXWeFerKjoTBL0plyc2o Up8u+3T2JA/gU3XdHJyPZ4TnOl6grzZRxQs4JylYJgCODYivfzvMd6NMoNw5KZR0liu/ h2ZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i2v/d08OHEPd+AR18JS6apn9EPHprIGOZ2OIam59E4w=; b=V1xAzK35OZjRfUsRIIfbNR6FtTGPKMksigA0j/Q94phm/UpjbkEK7CDW64tNnecKdo WydiRkH40gN5CA7Ei6pq/2wGY8KcLwLVlj2ta4x4pWZ0coCa7Y2sf1mEgRvHvfxQIjCS UeijzSqlA1xw1cNtQHvESusXcTbYf8VIYTuC4I/rI7xXaQvuTzvqkMj5jRekZnXqnUfC z+hc9XnY5vNbmtFqFMlEGhCNZCp2ubLEUshNUfcXWKUaSGsvQO9zuTm08iLtdUIEePkO Gp2X60PLQ13nUZO3kZoeKvrTuFxGjaLAlNDIHPlpg8F18CZIibyxHFkpE5zwkJw3hsRA nrdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532bmfOyoSbLs8eP5afiPPrl1LoQ8K4U11M/6n6APnK2X7gAcQ/h QchaoIUpm6CU0rafsaC2OJFLo2tamAdz2kYzRns=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIR0Hix3uq9ryahDwXIhyvjpRXLsu7PVESqjnoQnhAsSfeeNgHcgUvhS1Hv81B9CgjvOzmaA5DCW1JcNT0fJQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:61ca:: with SMTP id h10mr9666005otk.154.1592246589838; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 11:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHo7dC8oF4nOkVXf2=igaGdtRYTGk0a=rjkBZ7goYjZP+m25ew@mail.gmail.com> <E8A5F574-7D1B-4BE7-873E-9AFF84C0B3A8@nostrum.com> <CAHo7dC_O13kQdwMmkKcaQ1ctxVKSvv3EqdRfikBhohDaiaujsg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHo7dC_O13kQdwMmkKcaQ1ctxVKSvv3EqdRfikBhohDaiaujsg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Patrick McManus <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:42:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNri5J5p74Niosc4JKPhMOUTeq5hqK2ZjPD-RxQ0w75M6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Emad Omara <emadomara@google.com>
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Dispatch WG <dispatch@ietf.org>, sframe@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000061d98605a823cc6e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/hzV8IgNMVB7LqLtiMXaoFAdMykA>
Subject: Re: [Sframe] [dispatch] Request session at IETF 108 dispatch
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:43:13 -0000

Sounds really interesting Emad and there's obviously related work going on
(at least perc, maybe even mls..).

Sending that email Ben mentions to the dispatch list to raise awareness
with a link to the draft would be helpful in getting the process started..

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:33 PM Emad Omara <emadomara@google.com> wrote:

> Hi Ben,
>
> This draft proposes a solution for end-to-end encrypted conference calls.
> We implemented this in Google a couple of years ago in Duo, but the draft
> was only published last month given the current interest in the topic.
>
> The goal of the session is to go through the proposal and see if there is
> interest to continue working on this, and if so what will be the best WG to
> host this work.
>
> Thanks
> Emad
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:02 AM Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Emad,
>>
>> We prioritize DISPATCH meeting time to focus on topics that have had
>> DISPATCH list discussion and need high-bandwidth time to resolve. Unless
>> I’ve missed something, this topic has not previously come up in DISPATCH. I
>> suggest sending a note to this list with some background about the draft
>> and how you would like to see it progress.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Ben.
>>
>> On Jun 15, 2020, at 12:32 PM, Emad Omara <
>> emadomara=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We would like to have a session in the next IETF to discuss the SFrame
>> draft <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omara-sframe-00> Can you please
>> help scheduling this?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Emad
>> _______________________________________________
>> dispatch mailing list
>> dispatch@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>>
>>
>>