IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sframe] Concluding SFRAME

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 27 July 2022 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35F0C157B4F for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IgrQhWKrHdMJ for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7136BC14F733 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id bf9so27706969lfb.13 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BqjniqE+E3iPiuikQoHYAhqh2egWGBkwfCR6btHb2NE=; b=E2TM3+uwfVdpK0A5tiECJuT/cXARp+bAWqzZwRak54Dq9rcJ6H7GYrGfWIBnCIg3qZ py9sORSy/OBBGr3Ti/Gmxl0EFkGBw+79j+7XYGdJn7jLblHa0eCCeWCfoMC5KTSenRAW kGvHErnnKM0FeMu4wXk6vIALKOruoSt/Uw/PO94YVVm+6AlTGRIy1DPCzsYQB2BUOnD8 FU+PNY7g8kXWmH79C4cj7sMSFtJ1qjeXtLvSM8zybueck8aeRS05b6HFi4n0+fVT6875 2v6982PCkB2FtcxaIijPkaCRnnEWoaIz9Rdt7yXpYZgIX3yTBSb6bykOAznILlvaYUcv X0NQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BqjniqE+E3iPiuikQoHYAhqh2egWGBkwfCR6btHb2NE=; b=39p0QcK9sgYNiiKW4Ib6AMJCrMPcgD9iHPBWQPZlYHcE66RiBVO+hWgsbTB3sInB8W jVc55tZfg9x0bmIMD+V788xvggSpw1aMcdt3e6CoEZAN+WMFv9wLa30dg9J3dwwH5fUn XEujsu0qKZRxBD2WzCAG4GGx4Wzcgd/eSC8YrkS2zOy6TqtK1ixDpaVn3JPAqLPqHpdk +OLiG+wRKBuWeJ8rN9FRs39hRW7z9CNMCd/W1b4JPCDwDBTZDsW4KR/Lwy0WZULAzCKw tzj2f5ZgFXMeDIWnPWU371O99haHFqyzeNGm2awWhjb8rEksHYRjaHV2jTJRpM0PGHwf GvEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/IhLqUCBJy/rbebVt5Vr/u16idFdu18CvCpw/cutPUbo7hsJsh EovULf4u5w+DNpFiB5w249wClW4rcmenkIlOX9JODkeZei4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1t69fsKnSUDyB91aJyyMeDHpCec26sbARaJOa3Tg1GBFRexSFQp3FeQF0jFjE+tERuz/KqiMIhLWiHIUgw/P90=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3b1e:b0:48a:85b4:a764 with SMTP id f30-20020a0565123b1e00b0048a85b4a764mr7269868lfv.72.1658938308593; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwYJz930r+P=5bO8UZYHYuBDuW69MwWCE67BEQTOFnXw4g@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR06MB4037B9AD4403A8ECA6FB090291979@BYAPR06MB4037.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <81CC8365-A73B-4E06-BB4F-0846E721B675@apple.com> <CAL0qLwa8UMYanaK70etDAs33yFMGn7Pd85mWAFw0mZKumR7iQQ@mail.gmail.com> <FC861097-3B4F-405B-A662-74AF544623FF@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <FC861097-3B4F-405B-A662-74AF544623FF@apple.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 12:11:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbwu=-E+uGi=5i5BzPRzvQPoCTcW8g73Mr-UsVWbzoUfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Youenn Fablet <youenn@apple.com>
Cc: "Sergio Murillo (CosmoSoftware)" <sergio.garcia.murillo@cosmosoftware.io>, "sframe@ietf.org" <sframe@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000968ece05e4cbaca0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/iB05BtTYluDFNWDRdyFtiCfb1Fw>
Subject: Re: [Sframe] Concluding SFRAME
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Media Frames <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 16:11:55 -0000

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 11:45 AM Youenn Fablet <youenn@apple.com> wrote:

> The plan is to make this happen after the current draft is published as a
> WG draft.
>

Given that the working group could adopt even an initial version of such a
draft, with the understanding that it will be revised or even split as the
working group develops it, is there any reason that can't be done with what
you have now as a basis for discussion?

[BA] [...] other WGs (inside and outside of IETF) which depend on SFRAME
> are looking for "proof of life".
>

So's the AD.  :-)

An offline suggestion was made to fold this work into MOQ, which will be
chartering soon.  If that seems plausible, I suggest reaching out to the
chairs of their BoF (which completed minutes ago) and see if there's
something to that idea.

Otherwise, please let's get this moving.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email