Re: [Sframe] Concluding SFRAME

Youenn Fablet <youenn@apple.com> Wed, 27 July 2022 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <youenn@apple.com>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB907C15790C for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 08:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.687
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.687 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.582, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tAqXEkgRN0Vj for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 08:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp44.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp44.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 466F2C157901 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 08:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp44.rno.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp44.rno.apple.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 26RF5XAo031903; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 08:11:37 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=from : message-id : content-type : mime-version : subject : date : in-reply-to : cc : to : references; s=20180706; bh=gCXK+ucQ4vL5H2EofPvMHeKfX1x1rPkrhGybtCrTT6M=; b=o1XIQJ6B8QakSvuhESvhDJ9YAh0XLIfVk+HLMLAZgdUrf1FXZFvzJHS/+Pu0hWIHVt2V MKVi/cV6hXudb+EPy+GC7iN1R0SQJGrNg+0UWXx/ncqvb0YZrvaH2A6cZV8QrFUzPG/c eWTXyfI2lIP1IbG40MWSSf3VZRYophYrP1pMl9LpRf907Ikoo7GAb3E1/0XupnI7hSr6 RxrSlSHYNzFTe+50aycgzJl8E3Kmq86iYQXql2URw0m9jYza2XCr/OqPNEjOv/3qlH8r hXacdNjs7OUinWn6Ni90Yw4YnYu28lw5tdogoYWjo84nSJAPedt+xhTTsfMGl5jy9t00 +g==
Received: from crk-mailsvcp-mta-lapp04.euro.apple.com (crk-mailsvcp-mta-lapp04.euro.apple.com [17.66.55.17]) by rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp44.rno.apple.com with ESMTP id 3hgcg9cere-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 08:11:37 -0700
Received: from crk-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp03.euro.apple.com (crk-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp03.euro.apple.com [17.72.136.17]) by crk-mailsvcp-mta-lapp04.euro.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.18.20220407 64bit (built Apr 7 2022)) with ESMTPS id <0RFO00V7ZQ7C3910@crk-mailsvcp-mta-lapp04.euro.apple.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 16:11:36 +0100 (IST)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.crk-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp03.euro.apple.com by crk-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp03.euro.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.18.20220407 64bit (built Apr 7 2022)) id <0RFO00Z00PZ9ER00@crk-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp03.euro.apple.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 16:11:36 +0100 (IST)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: e23441fbb21d158e0813947021c11dc5
X-Va-E-CD: d277504602a7f612b6062ec869a6b50e
X-Va-R-CD: 4667316b123c8b26a7859467bdbad792
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: 2b70f689-c589-4fb0-b6eb-fd884732f907
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: e23441fbb21d158e0813947021c11dc5
X-V-E-CD: d277504602a7f612b6062ec869a6b50e
X-V-R-CD: 4667316b123c8b26a7859467bdbad792
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: 987da41d-bb32-46fd-8cf0-bf24a915074a
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.517, 18.0.883 definitions=2022-07-27_06:2022-07-27, 2022-07-27 signatures=0
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [17.235.198.227]) by crk-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp03.euro.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.18.20220407 64bit (built Apr 7 2022)) with ESMTPSA id <0RFO008I4Q7BVN00@crk-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp03.euro.apple.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 16:11:36 +0100 (IST)
From: Youenn Fablet <youenn@apple.com>
Message-id: <81CC8365-A73B-4E06-BB4F-0846E721B675@apple.com>
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5D90AE56-29D1-4D62-805E-206461928E2E"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 17:11:34 +0200
In-reply-to: <BYAPR06MB4037B9AD4403A8ECA6FB090291979@BYAPR06MB4037.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, "sframe@ietf.org" <sframe@ietf.org>
To: "Sergio Murillo (CosmoSoftware)" <sergio.garcia.murillo@cosmosoftware.io>
References: <CAL0qLwYJz930r+P=5bO8UZYHYuBDuW69MwWCE67BEQTOFnXw4g@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR06MB4037B9AD4403A8ECA6FB090291979@BYAPR06MB4037.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.517, 18.0.883 definitions=2022-07-27_05:2022-07-27, 2022-07-27 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/kjvQQIde9yaIsC1bJCUwRmpBA_8>
Subject: Re: [Sframe] Concluding SFRAME
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Media Frames <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 15:11:45 -0000

+1 to what Sergio said.

Also, there has been some progress on GitHub, admittedly very slow, to be able to finalise the first WG draft.
The latest commit was made 5 days ago.
I would expect a first WG draft to happen before the end of this summer.

Thanks,
	Y

> On 27 Jul 2022, at 17:00, Sergio Murillo (CosmoSoftware) <sergio.garcia.murillo@cosmosoftware.io> wrote:
> 
> Hi Murray,
>  
> I am almost done with the Cryptex and the WHIP drafts that have consumed most of my IETF-time. I was going to start working on SFrame next, so I would prefer not closing the WG.  
>  
> Best regards
> Sergio
>  
> From: Sframe <sframe-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:sframe-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy
> Sent: miƩrcoles, 27 de julio de 2022 16:42
> To: sframe@ietf.org <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Sframe] Concluding SFRAME
>  
> Colleagues,
>  
> We are once again looking at a moribund working group.  Although there are implementations and there were past promises of activity, and despite the efforts of the chairs, there has been no demonstrable progress here.
>  
> I propose we close.  If momentum reappears in the future, we can consider reopening, perhaps with a revised charter.  The list can remain open.
>  
> Absent a sustainable argument to the contrary, I'll do that sometime soon after the end of IETF 114 this week.
>  
> -MSK, ART AD
> -- 
> Sframe mailing list
> Sframe@ietf.org <mailto:Sframe@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>