[Sframe] PRs!
Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Tue, 08 March 2022 23:52 UTC
Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874103A1BE1 for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:52:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U3jIIbWCbMNh for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:52:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com (mail-qt1-x82d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1184B3A1BDE for <sframe@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:52:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id c4so610380qtx.1 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 15:52:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2N1riklOU+GQmkmih2Ny8+d4t2DW8rZoiaQanNVH4NE=; b=lEsjuQ43UxOSZ1Tkz8Da3wV4i9dbE8AIn3KNP+EwUt9SDMEBlndq9EVXHV91iGWgEX iqcRRVm+zpBCTFTiA9nvm2OUeoKuuirERRWZiISWwlx9rxjwDVv/ZB/VbQE3dslzLEXC 4oCmRuhnjdmvuGy0saWit2tvcM2xmFsJ8u/gXX0Ptnyutt/759iZ7oWB3nxo/xGcAiTO 1ECa25uNzkcJUy51TwbCHQFJ+2nXfbcfGWOm3ezMoyrvk3LheoI1yfrtlF8Ipe/G7Zpu qyAnTYKPBP5qDpu9kVrQ4iuWVt7KHxoDjdgcK2giTM8HiyxRwARzgmDjkqcDZAhKoU4W Pbpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2N1riklOU+GQmkmih2Ny8+d4t2DW8rZoiaQanNVH4NE=; b=GK+Sxo3Ui/B/ENAFz/T4KQeWv379N066tnFMdu112BnBHjVcncm3jff1/XsZBA1yeT W9Kv8L7lijr3Etp5w/DsFGgOIY5SVqpVmIC+waWL4WikgqVjwje/ZMdNFVkWvAnzgYQg OpiOwrkpViEatX+/juPLJQ/iYUaBhZMepWimtKIMeEtfZsxCjorRP5eVQGgVRKmrzCDI XjfEM7TCB4n2tcLg7KxDceb08QcWaupyRUmY9hdLpxztuuBTq8tBwPJcqW83cnWVYGNu 80Yr4LnIJcbA4ERoQwrZYGdJk4MKYumfCDJiS5xaQSMG2NSltHqjkHke3kafjHyeLfKd xiuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530IofW+LmGM3V0KgUQQBs09KA7E/43n1CEtNDE6L+iMsP/9qlwd kO+5MJDFcGzoME/vhNUVsNhgWjALc3zAnIO3/mZmSNE0az8S4g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw03V9eiDdHwquORoIC8vL36HO5IK9OGoMIfioex8Blbxl6Pv3qRbsCmCq2Cm76+eBZbTGCNZ4nzH1lualilnE=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4e82:0:b0:2e1:a1e1:b5c with SMTP id 2-20020ac84e82000000b002e1a1e10b5cmr41780qtp.122.1646783556356; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 15:52:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 18:52:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQM58vEfm2hRnedjaZSLd1rT1vboE+HGxA_LoUBtDLDRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: sframe@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e61f9b05d9bdaccc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/r_RwaUjC7ZOiY1h9tqQaoTNxFDA>
Subject: [Sframe] PRs!
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Media Frames <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 23:52:41 -0000
Hey all, It doesn't look like we have a slot at IETF 113, but this still seemed like a propitious time to re-energize this group. I've started doing a review of the spec, and just posted PRs on the first two, non-normative sections: https://github.com/eomara/sframe/pull/72 https://github.com/eomara/sframe/pull/73 Feedback welcome! There should obviously be more as I continue working through the spec. It seems like we should probably have a virtual interim at some point to discuss these. Also, I think we agreed to adopt the draft, so should the authors resubmit as draft-ietf-sframe-protocol? Cheers, --Richard
- [Sframe] PRs! Richard Barnes
- Re: [Sframe] PRs! Sergio Garcia Murillo